Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42721157›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Women's compliance with cervical cancer screening recommendations and associated barriers to participation: A cross-sectional analysis.

Lauma Spriņģe, Anda Ķīvīte-Urtāne, Ļubova Tihomirova, Inese Stars, Elza Mikule, Jana Žodžika, Aija Bukova-Žideļūna, Kersti Pärna, Mari Nygard, Anneli Uusküla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lauma SpriņģeInstitute of Public Health, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7681-9184
Anda Ķīvīte-UrtāneInstitute of Public Health, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.
Ļubova TihomirovaInstitute of Public Health, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2582-4999
Inese StarsInstitute of Public Health, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.
Elza MikuleInstitute of Public Health, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.
Jana ŽodžikaGynaecology Department, Riga East Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia.
Aija Bukova-ŽideļūnaInstitute of Public Health, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.
Kersti PärnaInstitute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Mari NygardCancer Registry of Norway, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Anneli UuskülaInstitute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4036-3856

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer screening (CCS) programmes play a key role in the early detection of cervical cancer (CC) and in reducing related morbidity and mortality. However, both under and overscreening deviate from evidence-based guidelines and can result in more harm rather than benefit. This cross-sectional study is aimed to evaluate the compliance of the CCS target group with the national CCS programme and to identify factors associated with different screening frequencies, including sociodemographic characteristics, health status and behaviour, awareness of the prevention of CC and the venue of the study participants' recruitment. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,279 women aged 25-70 years residing in Latvia. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess associations between CCS frequency (once every three years, biannually or more often, once every four years or less, and "do not remember") and independent variables, such as self-assessed health, chronic diseases, smoking and binge drinking, condom use and number of sexual partners and awareness of CCS invitation frequency, understanding of the frequency and purpose of the screening test, and knowledge of HPV vaccination, as well as venue of recruitment of study participants (colposcopy patients or general population). All variables were adjusted for key sociodemographic covariates. Overscreening (biannually or more often), underscreening (once every four years or less), and not recalling CCS history were strongly associated with a lack of awareness about the national CCS guidelines (e.g., unawareness that CCS is offered every three years). Overscreening was more common among participants recruited from colposcopy clinic. The results underscored the importance of health literacy in promoting appropriate screening behaviours. Addressing knowledge gaps through accessible and culturally relevant educational interventions could advance equity and enhance the effectiveness of CC prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPatient ComplianceUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLatviaMass ScreeningMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID42721157
PMCPMC13561318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.