ArticlePloS one2026
Women's compliance with cervical cancer screening recommendations and associated barriers to participation: A cross-sectional analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer screening (CCS) programmes play a key role in the early detection of cervical cancer (CC) and in reducing related morbidity and mortality. However, both under and overscreening deviate from evidence-based guidelines and can result in more harm rather than benefit. This cross-sectional study is aimed to evaluate the compliance of the CCS target group with the national CCS programme and to identify factors associated with different screening frequencies, including sociodemographic characteristics, health status and behaviour, awareness of the prevention of CC and the venue of the study participants' recruitment. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,279 women aged 25-70 years residing in Latvia. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess associations between CCS frequency (once every three years, biannually or more often, once every four years or less, and "do not remember") and independent variables, such as self-assessed health, chronic diseases, smoking and binge drinking, condom use and number of sexual partners and awareness of CCS invitation frequency, understanding of the frequency and purpose of the screening test, and knowledge of HPV vaccination, as well as venue of recruitment of study participants (colposcopy patients or general population). All variables were adjusted for key sociodemographic covariates. Overscreening (biannually or more often), underscreening (once every four years or less), and not recalling CCS history were strongly associated with a lack of awareness about the national CCS guidelines (e.g., unawareness that CCS is offered every three years). Overscreening was more common among participants recruited from colposcopy clinic. The results underscored the importance of health literacy in promoting appropriate screening behaviours. Addressing knowledge gaps through accessible and culturally relevant educational interventions could advance equity and enhance the effectiveness of CC prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.