Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42721156›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The impact and mechanisms of educational human capital on the risk of relapse into poverty: Evidence from Chinese micro-families.

Siliang Guo, Yan Qu, Youjia Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Siliang GuoSchool of Economics and Management, Qilu Normal University, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9093-9588
Yan QuSchool of Economics and Management, Qilu Normal University, Jinan, China.
Youjia LiuResearch Center of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, Kashi University, Kashi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9661-7900

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Educational human capital, as a critical driver of social development, plays an instrumental role in alleviating poverty and mitigating the risk of its recurrence. Drawing on human capital theory and utilizing data from four waves of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) spanning 2014-2020, this paper empirically examines the impact of educational human capital on the risk of relapse into poverty and explores its underlying mechanisms. The analysis employs panel data fixed-effects models, System GMM, and quantile regression. The findings indicate that: (1) Educational human capital significantly reduces the likelihood of household poverty relapse. (2) Mediation analysis reveals that this protective effect operates through three primary pathways: promoting non-agricultural employment among family members, increasing household income, and improving family health status. (3) Moderation analysis demonstrates that household investment in education substantially enhances the efficacy of educational human capital in mitigating relapse risk, whereas household health expenditure tends to attenuate this effect. (4) Heterogeneity analysis suggests that the marginal impact of educational human capital intensifies as the risk of poverty relapse rises, with the effect being more pronounced in eastern regions and urban areas. These findings deepen the understanding of how educational attainment influences poverty dynamics, offering empirical evidence and policy insights for developing countries aiming to consolidate poverty alleviation achievements and prevent poverty recurrence through educational strategies.

Indexed as

Educational StatusPovertyChinaEast Asian PeopleFamily CharacteristicsHumansIncome

Identifiers

PMID42721156
PMCPMC13561356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.