ArticlePloS one2026
Understanding the cost of caring in medicine through personhood: A systematic scoping review of compassion fatigue, vicarious trauma and secondary traumatic stress.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSupporting seriously ill patients and their families through the illness trajectory renders physicians susceptible to compassion fatigue (CF). Traditionally characterized as emotional and physical exhaustion following sustained empathic engagement, emerging research suggests that CF involves deeper disruptions to belief systems and professional identity formation (PIF), alongside an interplay with other trauma-related strain including secondary traumatic stress (STS) and vicarious trauma (VT) within the broader 'cost of caring' framework. However, such conceptual understanding remains fragmented and poorly synthesized in physician populations.
objectivesThis systematic scoping review (SSR) maps existing literature on CF, STS and VT among physicians in adult medical specialties, using the Ring Theory of Personhood to examine their defining features, exacerbating and mitigating factors, and existing interventions.
methodsThis SSR employed the modified Systematic Evidence-Based Approach that integrates human and AI-based resources. The research team systematically searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Google Scholar for articles published from 1st January 2000-30th June 2025, supplemented by searches on Elicit AI Pro. Eligible articles underwent content and thematic analyses, augmented by ChatGPT o3 Pro.
resultsOf 18,396 database abstracts and 497 Elicit AI Pro abstracts identified, 986 non-duplicate articles underwent full-text review, with 122 meeting the inclusion criteria. CF, STS and VT encompass moral, cognitive, relational and identity-related dimensions that shape belief systems and PIF. Sharing overlapping features, these constructs sit along a continuum, where early features of CF-including exhaustion, depersonalization and boundary erosion-may progress toward STS' characteristic post-traumatic stress-type intrusions. Unaddressed, these acute reactions can evolve into enduring cognitive and existential alterations denoting VT. This trajectory can be interrupted by individual and environmental protective factors.
conclusionReframing CF, STS and VT as a continuum of escalating strain disrupting physicians' PIF highlights the need for stage-specific interventions and effective assessment tools that better capture this expanded notion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.