ArticlePloS one2026
Care network types and depression among people with cognitive impairment: A latent class analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression is a common neuropsychiatric symptom in people with cognitive impairment. Although care networks, defined as groups of caregivers supporting an individual with cognitive impairment, may influence depression, evidence regarding this relationship remains limited. The purpose of this study was to identify the care network types among people with cognitive impairment and assess their association with depression. Using a nationally representative sample of older adults, 537 people with cognitive impairment who required assistance with activities of daily living were analyzed. Latent class analysis was employed to identify care network types according to the composition of six categories of care providers: spouses, children, extended family members, distant relatives/friends/neighbors, privately paid caregivers, and public caregivers. Multiple linear regression was then used to examine the associations between care network types and depression after adjusting for covariates. Five care network types were identified: Child-centered (n = 175, 32.6%), Spouse-centered (n = 101, 18.8%), Friends and Neighbors-centered (n = 43, 8.0%), Public-centered (n = 97, 18.1%), and Mixed (n = 121, 22.5%). Compared with the Child-centered Care Network, the Public-centered Care Network (β = 0.09, p = 0.041) and the Mixed Care Network (β = 0.14, p = 0.002) were associated with higher depression scores. In pairwise comparisons, the Public-centered and Mixed Care Networks also had significantly higher depression scores than the Child-centered, Spouse-centered, and Friends and Neighbors-centered Care Networks. These findings suggest that the overall configuration of caregivers may be relevant to depression among people with cognitive impairment and highlight the importance of considering care network composition when assessing their psychological well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.