ArticlePloS one2026
'PePApipe': A complete bioinformatics analysis pipeline for African Swine Fever Virus genome.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) is of high concern in porcine livestock across the world due to both the high mortality rates and the trade restrictions imposed on affected regions. The viral genome is large and complex, and genomic analysis is essential for tracing its origin and evolution. Although several bioinformatics tools exist for genome assembly and analysis, no single platform integrates all necessary steps in an accessible and systematic way. In this study the authors developed 'PePApipe', a custom-built, user-friendly pipeline that enables rapid, complete, and efficient ASFV genome analysis. It is specifically designed for laboratory professionals with limited bioinformatics experience, requiring only basic command-line knowledge. Starting from raw sequencing data, PePApipe integrates thirteen software tools into one automated workflow, covering quality control and pre-processing of raw reads, de novo genome assembly and variant calling. Programmed in Python, it can be executed locally through bash scripts, or using a Slurm protocol for batch processing of multiple samples. The main outputs are the ASFV consensus genome sequence and a file listing its putative variants compared to the selected reference genome. PePApipe classifies generated files into structured folders and produces intermediate files that can be used as inputs for further or parallel analyses; users can also enable or disable specific steps in each particular case. This pipeline is adaptable and complementary to downstream steps such as viral genome annotation or genome visualization. By consolidating all stages of viral genome analysis into a single automated workflow, PePApipe reduces the likelihood of user error, and enhances reproducibility and efficiency. This user-friendly pipeline facilitates the transition from sequencing to assembly and downstream analysis of viral genomes, ensuring a fast and reliable response to molecular analysis demands. Finally, the pipeline can be easily adapted to the study of other viral species, expanding its application in infectious diseases surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.