ArticlePLOS global public health2026
The relationship between reduced child spacing and depression in mothers: A cross-sectional study in Karachi, Pakistan.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short inter-birth intervals may increase maternal psychological stress and have been hypothesized to contribute to depressive symptoms. We assessed the association between recent birth spacing and depression in mothers in Karachi, Pakistan. We conducted a cross-sectional, interviewer-administered survey of mothers recruited via convenience sampling from public parks and shopping malls in Karachi. Eligible participants were mothers with ≥2 children who had delivered within the past five years; women who were currently pregnant or <2 months postpartum were excluded. Depressive symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); the primary outcome was PHQ-9 ≥ 10. Birth spacing was calculated as the interval between the two most recent live births and categorized as <24 months, 24-32 months, and ≥33 months (reference). We used logistic regression to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (aOR), adjusting for maternal age, education (formal vs none), number of children (2 vs ≥ 3), and household income (<50,000 vs ≥ 50,000 PKR). Of 202 completed questionnaires, 15 were excluded due to missing key exposure data, leaving 187 mothers for analysis; adjusted models included 181 participants. Overall, 37/187 (19.8%) screened positive for probable depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). Compared with spacing ≥33 months, the adjusted odds of PHQ-9 ≥ 10 were aOR 2.39, 95% CI 0.84-6.75 for spacing 24-32 months, and aOR 2.17, 95% CI 0.79-5.96 for <24 months. No formal education was associated with higher odds of PHQ-9 ≥ 10 (aOR 4.62, 95% CI 1.50-14.20). In this sample of mothers in Karachi, shorter birth spacing was not significantly associated with higher odds of probable depression. Larger, probability-based studies are needed to clarify the relationship between birth spacing and depression.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.