ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Navigating menstruation in adolescents with Down Syndrome: A mixed-methods study of caregiver reflections and adolescent voices in the UK.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescents with Down syndrome face unique menstrual health challenges, yet their experiences remain under-researched. This study aimed to investigate the menstrual health and wellbeing of adolescents with Down syndrome in the UK, examined primarily through the reflective lens of primary caregivers alongside direct accounts from adolescents, to inform the development of tailored, evidence-based interventions for this population. Guided by an advisory group of caregivers and young people with Down syndrome, this mixed-methods study (September 2024 - September 2025) involved a national online survey of primary caregivers (N = 143) and participatory interviews with adolescents (n = 6), mothers (n = 11) and healthcare and education professionals (n = 8). Quantitative data were analysed descriptively according to support needs (high vs low), and qualitative data were analysed thematically. The median age of menarche (12 years) aligned with the general population. While adolescents generally coped better with menarche than caregivers anticipated, 91% of 120 caregivers of adolescents who had reached menarche had ongoing menstruation concerns. While products like period underwear ("magic pants") improved independence and simplified care, key remaining concerns included: heavy periods (48%); personal care (45%); menstrual pain (45%); and the communication of pain (26%). The impact on adolescent wellbeing was greater for those with higher support needs. Additionally, 33% of caregivers felt "overwhelmed" by menstrual-related care. Decision-making about hormonal intervention was a source of heavy responsibility for caregivers. There is substantial demand for accessible educational and practical resources to support menstruation. Menstrual health is a highly individualised experience for adolescents with Down syndrome. Significant unmet needs persist, particularly for those with higher support needs. Successful outcomes require supporting caregivers through provision of accurate information that dispels pre-menarche anxiety alongside accessible and appropriate guidance to foster young people's independence, choice and autonomy. Future interventions must be co-developed with the Down syndrome community to ensure safe, dignified menstruation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.