ArticlePloS one2026
Research on dynamic model construction method based on RecurDyn secondary development.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficient multibody dynamics (MBD) modeling is critical for the dynamic analysis of complex engineering equipment, yet conventional manual workflows remain labor-intensive, time-consuming, and error-prone. This paper proposes an automated MBD modeling methodology based on Python-driven meta-programming and automated C# code generation, with the cutting unit of a drum shearer selected as a case study. The proposed method first extracts Computer-Aided Design (CAD) assembly features and then employs a hybrid lexical-semantic dual-stream architecture with a multi-level gating mechanism for robust component identification. To improve fault tolerance under non-standard naming conditions, a pre-trained multilingual Transformer model is incorporated as an auxiliary semantic matching module. Subsequently, a customized execution engine invokes the RecurDyn ProcessNet (PNet) to automatically complete material assignment, topology integration, constraint and drive generation, and gear contact definition. To validate the methodology, kinematic simulations were conducted on three shearer cutting units with different structural complexities. Model reliability was further verified through rigid-flexible coupled Discrete Element Method-Multi Flexible Body Dynamics (DEM-MFBD) simulations and corresponding physical experiments on a shearer testing platform. Results show that the method requires less than 1% of traditional modeling time with high accuracy. The maximum relative error of transmission rotational speeds is only 0.025%. Furthermore, the time-domain Root Mean Square (RMS) error of the drum vibration acceleration between simulation and experiment is 4.8%, while the maximum relative error of the primary characteristic frequencies is 4.1%. This rule-driven methodology provides a transferable framework for the rapid modeling and simulation of diverse complex mechanical MBD systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.