Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42721127›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Research on dynamic model construction method based on RecurDyn secondary development.

Lijuan Zhao, Shijie Yang, Yadong Wang, Xin Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lijuan ZhaoSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, China.
Shijie YangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4523-247X
Yadong WangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, China.
Xin JinSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient multibody dynamics (MBD) modeling is critical for the dynamic analysis of complex engineering equipment, yet conventional manual workflows remain labor-intensive, time-consuming, and error-prone. This paper proposes an automated MBD modeling methodology based on Python-driven meta-programming and automated C# code generation, with the cutting unit of a drum shearer selected as a case study. The proposed method first extracts Computer-Aided Design (CAD) assembly features and then employs a hybrid lexical-semantic dual-stream architecture with a multi-level gating mechanism for robust component identification. To improve fault tolerance under non-standard naming conditions, a pre-trained multilingual Transformer model is incorporated as an auxiliary semantic matching module. Subsequently, a customized execution engine invokes the RecurDyn ProcessNet (PNet) to automatically complete material assignment, topology integration, constraint and drive generation, and gear contact definition. To validate the methodology, kinematic simulations were conducted on three shearer cutting units with different structural complexities. Model reliability was further verified through rigid-flexible coupled Discrete Element Method-Multi Flexible Body Dynamics (DEM-MFBD) simulations and corresponding physical experiments on a shearer testing platform. Results show that the method requires less than 1% of traditional modeling time with high accuracy. The maximum relative error of transmission rotational speeds is only 0.025%. Furthermore, the time-domain Root Mean Square (RMS) error of the drum vibration acceleration between simulation and experiment is 4.8%, while the maximum relative error of the primary characteristic frequencies is 4.1%. This rule-driven methodology provides a transferable framework for the rapid modeling and simulation of diverse complex mechanical MBD systems.

Indexed as

Computer-Aided DesignModels, TheoreticalAlgorithmsComputer SimulationSoftware

Identifiers

PMID42721127
PMCPMC13561324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.