ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Phys-AbGAT: a physics-informed multi-task graph attention network for robust antibody-antigen binding affinity prediction.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAccurate prediction of antibody-antigen binding affinity is essential for therapeutic antibody design. Existing methods often model the dissociation constant (KD) and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) independently, overlooking their thermodynamic relationship and complex paratope-epitope spatial interactions.
resultsWe introduce Phys-AbGAT, a physics-informed multi-task graph attention network that represents the antibody-antigen interface as a spatial graph. It integrates ESM2 evolutionary embeddings with radial basis functions and employs a thermodynamically motivated auxiliary loss to encourage coupling between log10(KD) and ΔG. On an independent 42-complex benchmark, Phys-AbGAT achieved Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.569 for log10(KD) and 0.573 for ΔG. In matched-set comparisons, Phys-AbGAT achieved numerically lower RMSE and higher PCC than four baseline methods. The differences remained significant after Holm correction for MVSF-AB and PPA-Pred2, but not for AREA-AFFINITY or CSM-AB. Higher attention scores were assigned to several aromatic paratope residues, providing model-level hypotheses for structural inspection. These results support Phys-AbGAT as an interpretable multi-task geometric framework for joint prediction of two affinity-related quantities. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and data are available at https://github.com/cliffgao/Phys-AbGAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.