Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42720951›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2026

Cefepime and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis.

Zahra N Sohani, You Jia Zhong, Avideh Afshar, Bander A Assiri, Genevieve Gore, Matthew P Cheng, Anthony Lieu, Jordana Serero, Fergus Hamilton, Alexander Lawandi and 6 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Zahra N SohaniDivision of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, CIUSSS de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
You Jia ZhongDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Avideh AfsharDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Bander A AssiriDivision of Clinical and Translational Research, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Genevieve GoreSchulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Matthew P ChengDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Anthony LieuDivision of Infectious Diseases, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jordana SereroDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Fergus HamiltonSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Alexander LawandiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Mical PaulInfectious Diseases Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Dafna YahavInfectious Diseases Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Arthur M AlbuquerqueSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Guillaume Butler-LaporteDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Emily G McDonaldSchulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Todd C LeeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Cefepime is recommended for the treatment of febrile neutropenia and gram-negative infections at moderate risk of ampicillin resistance locus C β-lactamase production. Concerns regarding cefepime's safety have been raised in the literature without firm conclusions. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and bayesian random-effects meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing cefepime with other β-lactams for all-cause mortality. Data Sources: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, World Health Organization-International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, and LILACS were searched from inception to May 25, 2026. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials of children and adults comparing either (1) cefepime monotherapy vs any β-lactam monotherapy or (2) combination therapy of cefepime and a second drug vs β-lactam and the same second drug. Studies of prophylactic cefepime or cefepime and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, version 2.0. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was all-cause mortality (30-day or closest reported). Odds of mortality were synthesized using a hierarchical bayesian random-effects model on the log-odds scale. The posterior probabilities of increased mortality (odds ratio [OR] >1) with cefepime for the overall analysis and relevant subgroups were examined. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework. Results: Synthesis of 110 trials including 22 608 patients (cefepime: 11 726 patients [approximately 56% male]; comparator β-lactam: 10 882 patients [approximately 56% male]) showed a 94.4% posterior probability that the pooled OR mortality exceeded 1 with cefepime use compared with other β-lactams (778 [6.6%] vs 674 [6.2%]; OR, 1.10, 95% credible interval, 0.98-1.24). Meta-analysis of published peer-reviewed RCTs (73 trials, 15 411 patients) showed that cefepime was associated with a 98.6% posterior probability of higher mortality compared with other β-lactams (OR, 1.17; 95% credible interval, 1.02-1.34). Posterior distributions generally favored higher odds of mortality across all comparator β-lactams, across all clinical indications, and with doses of 2 g or more every 12 hours. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review and bayesian meta-analysis found that cefepime was associated with higher odds of all-cause mortality compared with other β-lactams. These findings support a nuanced discussion of cefepime's safety in guidance statements.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCefepimeFebrile NeutropeniaBayes TheoremHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicThird Generation CephalosporinsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefepimeThird Generation Cephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID42720951
PMCPMC13563263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.