Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42720950›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Patterns of Health Care Spending in Prostate Cancer.

Jiaye Shen, Aaron J Katz, Yahui Xie, Ronald C Chen, Mutlay Sayan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiaye ShenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.
Aaron J KatzDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.
Yahui XieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.
Ronald C ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.
Mutlay SayanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prostate cancer care has evolved substantially during the past decade, with increasing use of systemic therapies across the disease spectrum. How these changes have affected the composition of spending for prostate cancer-related health care remains incompletely characterized. Objective: To evaluate temporal trends in prostate cancer-related health care expenditures and identify the major components of care accounting for changes in spending from 2012 to 2021. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-level economic evaluation used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked data from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021. The analysis was performed in January 2026. Participants included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma and prostate cancer-related claims during the study period. Exposures: Calendar year and category of services for prostate cancer-related health care. Main Outcomes and Measures: Annual aggregate prostate cancer-related Medicare expenditures were inflation-adjusted to 2017 US dollars and categorized by radiotherapy, surgery, cryotherapy and/or high-intensity focused ultrasonography, systemic therapy, and diagnostic and monitoring services. Systemic therapy expenditures were further categorized as first-generation androgen deprivation therapy, second-generation androgen receptor-targeted therapy, and other systemic therapies. Results: In the descriptive fee-for-service cohort at diagnosis, 1 231 567 beneficiaries were included; the mean (SD) age was 73.2 (7.7) years. Aggregate prostate cancer-related expenditures increased from $504 million in 2012 to $1.9 billion in 2021. Radiotherapy accounted for $227 million (45.0%) in 2012 and $228 million (12.0%) in 2021, reflecting relatively stable absolute expenditures but a declining share of total spending. Surgery accounted for $53 million (10.5%) in 2012 and $67 million (3.5%) in 2021. In contrast, systemic therapy spending increased from $142 million (28.1%) in 2012 to $1.4 billion (74.0%) in 2021. By 2021, second-generation androgen receptor-targeted therapy accounted for $1.2 billion (86.6% of systemic therapy spending and 64.0% of total prostate cancer-related expenditures). Conclusions and Relevance: In this economic evaluation of SEER-Medicare data, spending for prostate cancer-related health care increased substantially from 2012 to 2021, with a marked shift toward systemic therapy. These findings suggest that prolonged systemic treatment has become a dominant component of prostate cancer spending and should be central to future discussions of health care sustainability.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFee-for-Service PlansHumansMaleMedicareSEER ProgramUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42720950
PMCPMC13563254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.