ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Deep Learning with Attention Mechanism for Pediatric Appendicitis Detection on Plain Abdominal Radiographs.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosing acute appendicitis in children is difficult due to clinical uncertainties. Ultrasonography is operator-dependent, whereas computed tomography carries radiation risks in the pediatric population. Although plain abdominal radiography is inexpensive, fast, and widely available, its sensitivity in diagnosing appendicitis is considered low. This study investigated the feasibility of detecting pediatric appendicitis from plain abdominal radiography using deep learning with preprocessing optimization and attention mechanism analysis. Plain abdominal radiographs of 162 pediatric patients who underwent surgery for appendicitis and 206 control subjects were retrospectively collected. Manual cropping and unsharp masking preprocessing were applied to the images. Five different deep learning architectures (EfficientNet-B0, ResNet50, DenseNet121, Swin-Tiny, ConvNeXt-Tiny), pre-trained on ImageNet, were fine-tuned and evaluated with fivefold stratified cross-validation using early stopping to prevent overfitting. Four attention mechanisms, namely Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE), Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM), Coordinate Attention (CA), and Parallel Coordinate-Channel Attention (PCCA), were then integrated into the best-performing architecture and systematically compared. EfficientNet-B0 demonstrated the highest baseline performance with an aggregated AUC of 0.804 (95% CI 0.760-0.846). Preprocessing ablation showed that manual cropping provided the largest gain, increasing AUC from 0.700 to 0.822, while unsharp masking provided a marginal additional contribution, reaching 0.824. The addition of SE attention achieved the highest aggregated AUC of 0.824 (95% CI 0.781-0.863), outperforming CA (0.814), CBAM (0.791), and PCCA (0.792). A branch-level ablation of PCCA showed that its ECA branch alone reached 0.819 with five learnable parameters, above both the full module and its coordinate branch, so combining the two brought no benefit at this data scale. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) analysis showed that the model focused on the right lower quadrant and pelvic region in a substantial proportion of appendicitis cases. The results suggest that plain abdominal radiography, combined with deep learning and attention-based optimization, could serve as a potential screening tool for pediatric appendicitis in the emergency department.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42720887What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.