ArticleMycopathologia2026
Deep Learning Based on DeepLabv3+ for Automated Identification, Segmentation, and Quantification of Fungi in Clinical Fluorescence Microscopy Images.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFungal fluorescence microscopy using Calcofluor White is a rapid and sensitive diagnostic tool for fungal infections. However, manual microscopic examination is limited by high subjectivity, observer fatigue, poor reproducibility, and a heavy reliance on professional expertise-particularly in high-throughput clinical screening.
objectivesTo develop and validate a DeepLabv3+-based deep learning model for the automated identification, precise segmentation, and quantification of fungal hyphae and spores in clinical fluorescence microscopy images.
methodsA total of 60,484 fungal fluorescence images were collected from 1863 clinical specimens across seven medical centers. Of these, 38,494 images were used for model training, while 2561 independent images were selected for clinical validation. Blinded manual microscopy by expert technicians served as the gold standard. The model's diagnostic performance, stability, and agreement were evaluated.
resultsThe model demonstrated robust diagnostic performance, with an accuracy of 90.32%, precision of 91.58%, recall (sensitivity) of 92.42%, and specificity of 88.39%. The Youden index was 0.8081, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91, indicating substantial agreement (Kappa = 0.798). The system exhibited excellent stability across repeated tests and automatically generated quantitative counts of hyphae and spores.
conclusionsThis DeepLabv3+-based deep learning system provides an accurate, stable, and high-throughput approach for clinical fungal fluorescence microscopy. It can standardize diagnostic procedures and improve efficiency for diagnosing superficial and suspected invasive fungal infections, serving as a reliable auxiliary diagnostic tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42720849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.