Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42720841›Full record

ArticleNeotropical entomology2026

Monitoring and Behavioral Control of Lepidopteran Pests in Soybean: Evaluation of Food-Based Attractants, Trap Performance, and Selectivity on Non-Target Organisms.

Vinicius Cesarin, Sabrina Cesarin de Oliveira, Allana Grecco Guedes, João Rafael Silva Soares, Odair Aparecido Fernandes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neotropical entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vinicius CesarinSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State Univ (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4464-4425
Sabrina Cesarin de OliveiraSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State Univ (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9236-1393
Allana Grecco GuedesDept of Biology, Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters, Univ of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2940-9240
João Rafael Silva SoaresSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State Univ (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8738-7743
Odair Aparecido FernandesSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State Univ (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Brazil. odair.fernandes@unesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3489-4754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemically mediated behavioral strategies, including semiochemicals and food-based attractants, have gained prominence in Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs because of their potential for selective and environmentally friendly pest control. The objective of this study is to evaluate the use of food-based attractants and two trap models (delta-ajar and funnel-ball) for monitoring adult lepidopteran pests in soybean fields. Additionally, the field performance and selectivity of an attract-and-kill (attractant + insecticide) strategy were assessed. Field trials were conducted in commercial soybean areas in Jaboticabal, São Paulo state, Brazil. Results indicated that funnel-ball traps captured a significantly higher number of target moths (36.8 ± 4.3 moths/trap/month) than delta-ajar traps (17.4 ± 2.9 moths/trap/month). However, both models presented similar species richness. Temporal patterns of moth abundance varied along the crop cycle and Helicoverpa armigera and Chrysodeixis includens populations peaked during the reproductive stages of soybean. In contrast, Spodoptera frugiperda and Elasmopalpus lignosellus were more abundant during the early vegetative stages, particularly within the first 20 days after plant emergence. The attract-and-kill application was associated with significantly higher moth mortality than the untreated control, especially for C. includens and E. lignosellus, with mortality peaking at 40 days after trap installation. Importantly, mortality among non-target organisms was relatively low (< 2% of total mortality), and was mainly restricted to a limited number of families such as Dolichopodidae, and Tachinidae (Diptera). These findings underscore the relevance of adaptive, phenology-aware pest management strategies that incorporate semiochemical tools with minimal ecological disruptions.

Indexed as

Glycine maxInsect ControlLepidopteraMothsPheromonesAnimalsPheromonesAttract-and-killIntegrated Pest ManagementNatural enemiesScoutingSelectivitySemiochemicals

Identifiers

PMID42720841
PMCPMC13562112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.