ArticleFamilial cancer2026
Current status of knowledge, diagnosis and management of hereditary colorectal cancer among physicians in China: a national questionnaire survey of 81 doctors from different hospitals.
Article in Familial cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hereditary colorectal cancer (HCRC), including Lynch syndrome (LS) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), accounts for 5-10% of colorectal cancers (CRC); however, little is known about physicians' awareness and management of these conditions in China. We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey of 81 physicians from 81 Chinese hospitals using a 74-item questionnaire assessing genetic testing, pedigree management, and LS/FAP protocols. The mean annual CRC caseload was 1093 per hospital, in stark contrast to only 32 HCRC cases. The LS diagnosis rate was alarmingly low (0.83% vs. expected 2-3%). Although 95.1% of hospitals offered dMMR immunohistochemistry, only 85.3% of CRC patients received it. Genetic testing completion rates were poor: 74.1% and 76.5% of hospitals reported 0-25% completion for suspected HCRC patients and first-degree relatives, respectively. Major barriers included high costs (93.8%), lack of insurance coverage (75.3%), and patient refusal (51.9%). Fewer than one-third of centers adhered to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Only 8.6% incorporated risk-reducing hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy into standard practice. Merely 13.6% maintained family management systems, 23.5% employed genetic counselors, and 46.9% had received HCRC training. HCRC diagnosis and management in China are inadequate, with substantial guideline-practice gaps. Urgent interventions are needed to improve physician education, reduce financial barriers, and implement standardized protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42720829What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.