ReviewCancer metastasis reviews2026
Langerhans cell histiocytosis: molecular mechanisms underlying pathogenesis and emerging targeted therapeutics.
Review in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a nonhereditary myeloid neoplasm driven by somatic alterations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, most commonly involving BRAF and MAP2K1 (MEK1). Oncogenic BRAF alterations activate MAPK signaling through diverse structural mechanisms. The prominent BRAF(V600E) mutation traps BRAF in a constitutively active status by forming the K507-E600 salt bridge independent of upstream RAS signaling. In contrast, non-V600E BRAF mutants exhibit variable kinase activity, among which kinase-dead variants rely on BRAF/CRAF heterodimerization and transactivate CRAF. In parallel, oncogenic MEK1 mutations disrupt autoinhibition or enhance MEK1 homodimerization, sustaining MAPK activation. Furthermore, RAF/MEK heterodimerization modulates pathway output and persistence. These mechanistic insights provide a strong biological rationale for therapeutic targeting of the MAPK pathway in LCH, thereby driving the clinical use of BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) including vemurafenib and dabrafenib, as well as MEK inhibitors (MEKi) such as trametinib and cobimetinib. However, the efficacy is frequently limited by acquired resistance associated with MAPK pathway reactivation through RAF and MEK dimerization-dependent mechanisms. Collectively, these altered molecular interactions contribute to the pathway dysregulation and signaling persistence, thereby providing a mechanistic basis for adaptive resistance and for developing next-generation RAFi and MEKi. This review therefore summarizes the current understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying MAPK pathway activation and therapeutic resistance in LCH, with particular emphasis on conformational switch-based regulations of RAF and MEK proteins, and discusses emerging strategies involving next-generation RAFi and RAFi plus MEKi combinations aimed to achieve more durable MAPK pathway suppression and improving long-term outcomes of LCH treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.