ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Age limits and shared decision-making in paediatric healthcare: an exploratory survey of the Young European Academy of Paediatrics.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite guidance from the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child's (UNCRC) affirming that children have the right to be heard in all matters affecting them, European legal and clinical practices for paediatric healthcare decision-making remain variable. This study examines the perspectives of members of the Young European Academy of Paediatrics (yEAP), the network of national junior paediatric representatives within the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP), on age limits, harmonisation of age limits across Europe, and their exposure to formal training in shared decision-making with children. Between 26 May and 1 August 2025, a survey was distributed among paediatricians in training and young specialists who are active delegates of the yEAP. The survey evaluated their preferred minimum age limits across different healthcare domains, their views on harmonisation of age limits across Europe, and their exposure to formal training in shared decision-making with children. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. The findings reveal a variation in preferred minimum age limits for paediatric healthcare across different domains. The results are based on perspectives of 20 participants from different countries in Europe. Most participants (70%) favoured standardising age limits across Europe. Participants noted a substantial lack of formal training (85%) in shared decision-making with children.
conclusionThis study highlights both opportunities and challenges in translating child rights frameworks into practice. Given the small sample size, findings are exploratory, underscoring the need for broader research and context-specific policy and training initiatives. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Guidance from the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child's (UNCRC) affirms that children have the right to be heard in all matters affecting them. • Despite the guidance from frameworks like the UNCRC, variability persists in European legal and clinical practices regarding paediatric healthcare decision making. WHAT IS NEW: • The findings indicate that preferred minimum age thresholds for autonomous decision-making are not uniform but vary across healthcare domains. • Most participants favoured standardising age limits across Europe. • Participants noted a substantial lack of formal training in shared decision making with children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42720795What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.