Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42720795›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Age limits and shared decision-making in paediatric healthcare: an exploratory survey of the Young European Academy of Paediatrics.

Charelity Adu-Gallant, Nora Karara, Julia Erdi, Sian Copley, Jaan Toelen, Kris Dierickx, J Peter de Winter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Charelity Adu-GallantDepartment of Development and Regeneration, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Herestraat 49 , Leuven, Box 805, 3000, Belgium.
Nora KararaEuropean Academy of Paediatrics (EAP), Brussels, Belgium.
Julia ErdiEuropean Academy of Paediatrics (EAP), Brussels, Belgium.
Sian CopleyEuropean Academy of Paediatrics (EAP), Brussels, Belgium.
Jaan ToelenDepartment of Development and Regeneration, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Herestraat 49 , Leuven, Box 805, 3000, Belgium.
Kris DierickxChild and Youth Institute, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Tiensestraat 102, Leuven, Box 3717, 3000, Belgium.
J Peter de WinterDepartment of Development and Regeneration, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Herestraat 49 , Leuven, Box 805, 3000, Belgium. pdewinter@spaarnegasthuis.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite guidance from the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child's (UNCRC) affirming that children have the right to be heard in all matters affecting them, European legal and clinical practices for paediatric healthcare decision-making remain variable. This study examines the perspectives of members of the Young European Academy of Paediatrics (yEAP), the network of national junior paediatric representatives within the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP), on age limits, harmonisation of age limits across Europe, and their exposure to formal training in shared decision-making with children. Between 26 May and 1 August 2025, a survey was distributed among paediatricians in training and young specialists who are active delegates of the yEAP. The survey evaluated their preferred minimum age limits across different healthcare domains, their views on harmonisation of age limits across Europe, and their exposure to formal training in shared decision-making with children. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. The findings reveal a variation in preferred minimum age limits for paediatric healthcare across different domains. The results are based on perspectives of 20 participants from different countries in Europe. Most participants (70%) favoured standardising age limits across Europe. Participants noted a substantial lack of formal training (85%) in shared decision-making with children.

conclusionThis study highlights both opportunities and challenges in translating child rights frameworks into practice. Given the small sample size, findings are exploratory, underscoring the need for broader research and context-specific policy and training initiatives. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Guidance from the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child's (UNCRC) affirms that children have the right to be heard in all matters affecting them. • Despite the guidance from frameworks like the UNCRC, variability persists in European legal and clinical practices regarding paediatric healthcare decision making. WHAT IS NEW: • The findings indicate that preferred minimum age thresholds for autonomous decision-making are not uniform but vary across healthcare domains. • Most participants favoured standardising age limits across Europe. • Participants noted a substantial lack of formal training in shared decision making with children.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDecision Making, SharedPediatricsAge FactorsChildEuropeEuropean PeopleFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescent healthcareConsentConvention on the Rights of the childDecision-making capacityLegal frameworksMaturityMedical decision-makingPaediatric healthcare

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.