ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Optimisation of an Algorithm for Fetal Strain by CMR and its Use in Suspected Coarctation of the Aorta.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta (CoA) remains challenging, with low detection rates and high false positive rates. It is unknown whether fetuses that develop postnatal CoA (true CoA) exhibit impaired ventricular strain prenatally or whether fetal cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived strain can improve diagnostic accuracy. In addition, fetal strain assessment by CMR requires optimisation and validation. Forty-two third-trimester fetuses underwent fetal CMR at 1.5 T with Doppler ultrasound gating. Left and right ventricular four-chamber strain were assessed using feature tracking and endocardial shortening, respectively. Strain analysis was optimised by adjusting contour stiffness and tracking distance parameters and comparing results with myocardial centreline shortening. Fetal echocardiographic markers associated with true CoA were also evaluated, including the mitral-to-tricuspid valve ratio (MV/TV), aortic isthmus-to-duct ratio (I/D), the combined I/D × MV/TV ratio, and the carotid-subclavian artery index (CSAI). Strain analysis was feasible in 35 fetuses (9 true CoA, 18 false positives, and 8 controls). LV and RV strain values were significantly affected by optimization settings. Although fetuses with true CoA showed a tendency toward lower LV strain, no significant differences in LV or RV strain were observed between groups (all p > 0.05). In contrast, echocardiographic ratios differed between groups (all p < 0.05). Fetal CMR-derived strain is highly dependent on analysis methodology, and values obtained using different techniques are not interchangeable. While echocardiographic markers were associated with outcome, overlap between groups limits their predictive value. In its current form, fetal CMR-derived strain does not improve prenatal CoA diagnosis beyond established echocardiographic markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42720778What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.