Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42720765›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Prostate MRI reporting and its impact on clinical decision-making: the urologists' perspective.

Mert Emre Erden, Seyfettin Anıl Tantekin, Ahmad Gharehmohammadlou, Öner Şanlı

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mert Emre ErdenDepartment Urology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0651-1579
Seyfettin Anıl TantekinDepartment Urology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9381-4083
Ahmad GharehmohammadlouDepartment Urology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0269-9309
Öner ŞanlıDepartment of Urology, Subdivision of Urooncology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. onersanli@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5801-6898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has fundamentally changed the diagnostic and management pathways for prostate cancer (PCa). Its clinical utility depends not only on image quality and interpretative accuracy but also on the completeness and precision of the radiological report. This review synthesizes the available evidence across five key reporting domains that directly impact clinical decision-making: (1) pre-biopsy triage, including Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring and Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) assessment; (2) prostate volume measurement and PSA density (PSAD) reporting; (3) local staging, with particular emphasis on extraprostatic extension (EPE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI); (4) regional lymph node assessment, and (5) serial MRI monitoring using the PRECISE v2 framework for men undergoing active surveillance. Evidence from randomised controlled trials, large cohort studies, meta-analyses, and clinical practice guidelines published up to March 2026 was synthesised, with priority given to the highest level of available evidence and current European Association of Urology guidance. For each domain, we define the core reporting elements and discuss the evidence supporting their clinical relevance from both radiological and urological perspectives. Across all five domains, the clinical value of prostate MRI depends as much on complete and standardised reporting as on the quality of image acquisition and interpretation.

Indexed as

Image-guided biopsyMagnetic resonance imagingMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingNeoplasm stagingProstatic neoplasmsWatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID42720765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.