ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Prostate MRI reporting and its impact on clinical decision-making: the urologists' perspective.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has fundamentally changed the diagnostic and management pathways for prostate cancer (PCa). Its clinical utility depends not only on image quality and interpretative accuracy but also on the completeness and precision of the radiological report. This review synthesizes the available evidence across five key reporting domains that directly impact clinical decision-making: (1) pre-biopsy triage, including Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring and Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) assessment; (2) prostate volume measurement and PSA density (PSAD) reporting; (3) local staging, with particular emphasis on extraprostatic extension (EPE) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI); (4) regional lymph node assessment, and (5) serial MRI monitoring using the PRECISE v2 framework for men undergoing active surveillance. Evidence from randomised controlled trials, large cohort studies, meta-analyses, and clinical practice guidelines published up to March 2026 was synthesised, with priority given to the highest level of available evidence and current European Association of Urology guidance. For each domain, we define the core reporting elements and discuss the evidence supporting their clinical relevance from both radiological and urological perspectives. Across all five domains, the clinical value of prostate MRI depends as much on complete and standardised reporting as on the quality of image acquisition and interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42720765What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.