Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42720738›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2026

Empowering leaders, empowering teams: fostering wellness through leadership.

Rama Ayyala

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rama AyyalaCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA. rama.ayyala@cchmc.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric radiology is deeply meaningful work, yet increasing workplace stress and burnout threaten workforce engagement, retention, and the delivery of high-quality patient care. Historically, many wellness initiatives have focused on individual-level interventions, such as resilience training and mindfulness, while inadequately addressing the organizational and operational factors that contribute to employee distress. Growing evidence suggests that burnout is driven less by deficiencies in individual resilience than by chronic workplace stressors, including excessive workload, inefficient workflows, staffing shortages, communication challenges, and organizational culture. As a result, leadership has emerged as a critical determinant of workforce well-being. In this commentary, a framework is proposed for wellness-centered leadership in pediatric radiology that reframes leadership itself as a primary wellness intervention. The framework is built upon three foundational pillars: caring about people by fostering psychological safety and trust; cultivating relationships through inclusive leadership, meaningful work, and community; and inspiring change by addressing operational barriers that create unnecessary workplace distress. Employee experience should be measured-including professional fulfillment, psychological safety, workplace inclusion, and retention risk-with the same rigor applied to traditional departmental metrics such as quality, access, productivity, and patient experience. Improving workforce well-being requires moving beyond performative wellness initiatives toward leadership strategies that intentionally shape organizational culture and the daily work environment. By creating psychologically safe, collaborative, and operationally effective workplaces, pediatric radiology leaders can promote professional fulfillment, strengthen workforce sustainability, and ultimately improve the care delivered to children and families.

Indexed as

LeadershipPediatric radiologyWellness

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.