ReviewBiogerontology2026
Mitochondrial homeodynamics in ageing: mechanisms, resilience, and interventions.
Review in Biogerontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitochondria integrate bioenergetics, redox signalling, calcium handling, biosynthesis, apoptosis, and stress responses. Their contribution to ageing depends less on any single pathway than on the ability to sustain these functions through continuous maintenance, remodelling, and inter-organelle communication. This review proposes mitochondrial homeodynamics as a systems-level framework for that ability, which rests not on static preservation but on three linked capacities. Maintenance safeguards mitochondrial genome, proteome, and membrane integrity. Adaptation adjusts metabolism and remodels network and cristae architecture to match changing demand. Recovery restores function and reserve after challenge. These capacities emerge from mitochondrial quality control, network and cristae remodelling, biogenesis, mitophagy, retrograde stress signalling, and inter-organelle communication. So defined, mitochondrial dysfunction becomes a measurable loss of capacity rather than a descriptive category. Ageing erodes these capacities in tissue- and context-specific ways, which reduces physiological reserve, slows recovery after stress, and amplifies sterile inflammation. The mechanisms underlying these capacities, the biomarkers that report them, and the interventions proposed to preserve them are evaluated in turn. Exercise provides the strongest human evidence for coordinated mitochondrial and functional adaptation, whereas evidence for energy restriction, NAD+ precursors, mitophagy-supporting compounds, and mitochondria-targeted agents remains heterogeneous and endpoint-specific. No mitochondrial intervention has been shown to slow ageing or extend lifespan in healthy humans, and movement of a biomarker towards a younger reference value does not establish rejuvenation. Progress will require dynamic measures of maintenance, adaptation, and recovery, obtained in defined tissues and interpreted alongside clinically meaningful outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.