Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42720705›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2026

Uptake of germline testing for Lynch Syndrome in patients with deficient mismatch repair/ microsatellite-high colorectal cancer in the public hospital system in South Australia.

Preethi Vembar, Eryn Dow

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Preethi VembarRoyal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Preethi.vembar@sa.gov.au.
Eryn DowRoyal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lynch syndrome (LS) accounts for approximately 4% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and arises from pathogenic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Australian guidelines recommend universal MMR or microsatellite instability (MSI) screening in all CRC patients; however, real-world uptake remains variable. This study evaluated rates of MMR/MSI screening, germline testing, and genetics referrals across two major public hospitals in South Australia. A retrospective review of 1775 patients discussed at colorectal multidisciplinary team meetings in the Royal Adelaide and Queen Elizabeth hospitals between January 2021 and December 2023 was conducted to identify rates of MMR/MSI screening and subsequent referral of eligible patients to genetics. Of the 1129 colorectal cancer cases identified, MMR/MSI testing was performed in 93.2% (1052/1129), with deficiency detected in 12.5% (131/1052). Of these, 37% (49/131) were eligible for genetics referral after exclusion of somatic causes. Among eligible patients, 73.5% (36/49) were referred, and 43% (21/49) underwent germline testing. LS was confirmed in 12 patients (9% of deficient MMR CRC), while 9 patients (6.9%) were classified as having Lynch-like syndrome. Despite high screening rates, gaps remain in genetics referral and testing. Barriers included lack of reflex testing, loss to follow-up, and patient refusal. Targeted system-level interventions and improved genomic education are needed to enhance adherence to guidelines and optimise patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA Mismatch RepairGenetic TestingMicrosatellite InstabilityAdultAgedFemaleGerm-Line MutationHospitals, PublicHumansMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesSouth AustraliaCancerLynch syndromeMainstream genetic testingMismatch repair genes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.