Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42720698›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026

L1 Influence on Familiar and Unfamiliar L2 Idiom Comprehension: An Investigation Across L2 Proficiency Levels.

Enis Oğuz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Enis OğuzMiddle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. enisoguz@metu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5819-4926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in bilingualism has repeatedly demonstrated the profound challenge bilinguals experience with L2 idioms due to their opaque figurative meanings. Despite the attempts to reveal significant influences on this challenging task, studies and models usually fail to consider all key determinants, either due to demanding sample sizes or due to the simple omission of potential effects. While individual idiom characteristics are commonly examined in the literature, the interplay between L1 influence, idiom familiarity, and L2 proficiency in L2 idiom comprehension is usually overlooked. By recruiting a large pool of bilinguals (n = 251) across varying L2 proficiency levels, this study primarily focused on these interactive variables from a developmental perspective. Additionally, idiom characteristics (transparency and imageability) and individual differences (L2 Age of Acquisition, reading exposure, and listening exposure) were explored as secondary factors. The analyses revealed distinct developmental trajectories. Familiar L2 idioms seemed to follow holistic processing patterns, while unfamiliar L2 idiom comprehension was likely to be affected by crosslinguistic influences. In particular, the findings indicated a developmental path in which bilinguals abandon surface-level L1 lexical overlap with increasing L2 proficiency and rely more on conceptual features, with L1 lexical overlap becoming inhibitory. In addition, the findings suggested that imageability could decrease L2 idiom comprehension accuracy, while L2 reading and listening exposure could boost accuracy and comprehension speed. Overall findings suggest that current idiom comprehension models require fundamental modifications in order to account for the dynamic and proficiency-dependent nature of bilingual idiom comprehension.

Indexed as

ComprehensionMultilingualismPsycholinguisticsReadingRecognition, PsychologyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansIndividualityMaleYoung AdultIdiom familiarityIndividual differencesL1 influenceL2 idiom comprehensionL2 proficiency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.