ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026
L1 Influence on Familiar and Unfamiliar L2 Idiom Comprehension: An Investigation Across L2 Proficiency Levels.
Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research in bilingualism has repeatedly demonstrated the profound challenge bilinguals experience with L2 idioms due to their opaque figurative meanings. Despite the attempts to reveal significant influences on this challenging task, studies and models usually fail to consider all key determinants, either due to demanding sample sizes or due to the simple omission of potential effects. While individual idiom characteristics are commonly examined in the literature, the interplay between L1 influence, idiom familiarity, and L2 proficiency in L2 idiom comprehension is usually overlooked. By recruiting a large pool of bilinguals (n = 251) across varying L2 proficiency levels, this study primarily focused on these interactive variables from a developmental perspective. Additionally, idiom characteristics (transparency and imageability) and individual differences (L2 Age of Acquisition, reading exposure, and listening exposure) were explored as secondary factors. The analyses revealed distinct developmental trajectories. Familiar L2 idioms seemed to follow holistic processing patterns, while unfamiliar L2 idiom comprehension was likely to be affected by crosslinguistic influences. In particular, the findings indicated a developmental path in which bilinguals abandon surface-level L1 lexical overlap with increasing L2 proficiency and rely more on conceptual features, with L1 lexical overlap becoming inhibitory. In addition, the findings suggested that imageability could decrease L2 idiom comprehension accuracy, while L2 reading and listening exposure could boost accuracy and comprehension speed. Overall findings suggest that current idiom comprehension models require fundamental modifications in order to account for the dynamic and proficiency-dependent nature of bilingual idiom comprehension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42720698What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.