ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Exercise and physical activity changes during the menstrual cycle in users of the Flo app.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundCyclical hormonal fluctuations across the menstrual cycle influence physiological systems beyond the reproductive system, including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and neurological systems, and are associated with changes in menstrual symptoms. These changes may influence physical activity behaviours and exercise performance; however, evidence remains limited. Digital health applications enable analysis of these patterns at scale using real-world longitudinal data.ObjectivesInvestigate how step counts and energy expenditure change over the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle.DesignThis is a cohort study analysing step count and exercise log data recorded in the Flo app by women tracking their ovulation and menstrual cycle.MethodsThis study analysed step count and exercise log data from 5,703 Flo app users. Cycle phases were estimated using user-reported period start and end dates combined with ovulation test results. Differences in step count and energy expenditure were examined across the phases of the menstrual cycle.ResultsMedian step counts varied across cycle phases (p=0.003), with the lowest step counts during the mid-follicular phase and the highest counts during the late luteal phase. Linear mixed models showed step counts were higher in all other cycle phases compared with bleeding days, with the largest difference 1.8% higher in the late luteal phase compared with bleeding days. Mixed models revealed energy expenditure during gym workouts differed by cycle phase, with the early luteal phase showing a 5.2% greater energy expenditure compared to bleeding days.ConclusionWe found measurable but small effects of menstrual cycle phase on step counts and energy expenditure during gym workouts in a large group of Flo app users. While statistically significant, the small magnitude of effects by cycle phase on step counts and energy expenditure suggests the differences may have minimal clinical or practical relevance, though further research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.