ArticleHealth promotion international2026
The role of lived and living experience in evidence-based decision-making in suicide prevention.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence-based decision-making in suicide prevention is shaped not only by research evidence but also by population needs, resources, and the implementation context. While lived and living experience is a core focus of contemporary suicide prevention policy and practice in Australia, little is known about how it is valued, integrated, and reconciled with other decision-making factors. The present study explored how lived and living experience knowledge informs evidence-based decision-making in suicide prevention, how factors that affect decision-making can be reconciled, and what resources are needed to improve it. Eighty-nine participants from the Australian suicide prevention sector engaged in a qualitative, participatory workshop at the 2025 Lived Experience of Suicide Summit. Participants included people with lived and living experience of suicide and those working across policy, service delivery, funding, and research. Data were collected through structured activities and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and descriptive content analysis. Participants perceived lived and living experience knowledge to inform a small proportion of suicide prevention decisions. Findings indicated mixed effectiveness of current engagement practices, with tokenism and disengagement being key markers of ineffective engagement. Systemic issues, such as power dynamics and sector culture, were identified as factors that impact how knowledge and expertise are valued and integrated into decision-making. Strengthening the integration of lived and living experience into decision-making requires a paradigm shift that positions lived and living experience knowledge as a legitimate and integral form of evidence. This includes resources to support embedding engagement into suicide prevention approaches, structural supports, and increased implementation capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.