ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
Optic Disc and Retinal Strain Due to Vertical Duction.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To compare two-dimensional optic disc and retinal vessel strains due to vertical versus horizontal eye rotations in younger and older subjects using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (cSLO). Methods: In a younger subject group (n = 10; range, 18-39 years; mean age ± SD, 30 ± 6 years) and an older subject group (n = 29; at least 40 years of age; mean age ± SD, 67 ± 10 years), high-resolution infrared cSLO images were acquired in central gaze, 10° supraduction and infraduction, and 30° abduction and adduction. Images were segmented using a deep-learning model to identify retinal vessels, optic disc, and fovea. Ocular torsion was corrected, and eccentric gaze images were registered to the central gaze image. Displacement fields between image pairs were estimated using Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms (RAFT) optical flow and converted to two-dimensional strains. Repeatability was assessed on nine additional subjects (five younger, three older, and one child 14 years old) by analyzing duplicate image acquisitions. Results: Equivalent strain within the optic disc reached ∼2% during all four eccentric gazes despite smaller vertical ductions and decreased rapidly with distance from the disc. Younger subjects exhibited approximately twice the vessel strain as older subjects for the same gaze angles. Horizontal strain reached about 1% during adduction and was greater in eyes with longer axial length. Shear strain reached about 0.48% during supraduction. Conclusions: Modest vertical ductions produce two-dimensional retinal vascular strains comparable to large horizontal ductions. Age and axial length significantly influence strain magnitude during duction, suggesting that resulting mechanical loading on the posterior eye might be more significant than previously appreciated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.