Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42720326›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2026

Universal Interatomic Potentials as Configuration-Space Generators for One-Shot and Iterative Fine-Tuning of Ab Initio-Accurate Material-Specific Models.

Jonas Hänseroth, Aaron Flötotto, Christian Dreßler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonas HänserothTheoretical Solid State Physics, Institute of Physics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-8324-6160
Aaron FlötottoTheoretical Solid State Physics, Institute of Physics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693Ilmenau, Germany.
Christian DreßlerTheoretical Solid State Physics, Institute of Physics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0145-1263

Funding

Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung P2023-02-008European Social Fund Plus NAStudienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes NATh?ringer Aufbaubank 2024 FGR 0081/0082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universal machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) are rapidly becoming general-purpose tools for atomistic simulation, but their role in quantitative materials modeling when reactive events are involved remains unsettled. We compare five universal MLIPs across seven chemically diverse systems and find that strong performance on standard benchmarks does not guarantee accurate predictions of the target observables. In particular, zero-shot models do not reliably reproduce reactive, transport, or high-barrier processes, exemplified here in particular by the sulfur-vacancy jump in MoS2. We therefore benchmark a practical alternative against target observables: universal MLIPs are used to generate long molecular dynamics trajectories, the resulting configurations are subsampled and relabeled with DFT, and material-specific MLIPs are subsequently trained or fine-tuned on the resulting first-principles data sets. This workflow converts universal models into efficient configuration-space generators while retaining ab initio reference labels for training and turns their systematic softening of the potential energy surface from a liability into a sampling advantage. Across the tested systems, 2000 DFT-recalculated structures are often sufficient to obtain accurate fine-tuned or trained-from-scratch models. For the most challenging case, iterative self-training progressively refines the sampled configuration space and recovers the DFT MoS2 potential energy profile with only 600 first-principles calculations in total. For a 512-atom system on a single nvidia A100 GPU and four 32-core CPU nodes, the complete workflow─including training data generation, DFT labeling, and model creation─delivers 1,000,000 ab initio-quality MD steps in 3 days.

Identifiers

PMID42720326
PMCPMC13573618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.