ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2026
Universal Interatomic Potentials as Configuration-Space Generators for One-Shot and Iterative Fine-Tuning of Ab Initio-Accurate Material-Specific Models.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Universal machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) are rapidly becoming general-purpose tools for atomistic simulation, but their role in quantitative materials modeling when reactive events are involved remains unsettled. We compare five universal MLIPs across seven chemically diverse systems and find that strong performance on standard benchmarks does not guarantee accurate predictions of the target observables. In particular, zero-shot models do not reliably reproduce reactive, transport, or high-barrier processes, exemplified here in particular by the sulfur-vacancy jump in MoS2. We therefore benchmark a practical alternative against target observables: universal MLIPs are used to generate long molecular dynamics trajectories, the resulting configurations are subsampled and relabeled with DFT, and material-specific MLIPs are subsequently trained or fine-tuned on the resulting first-principles data sets. This workflow converts universal models into efficient configuration-space generators while retaining ab initio reference labels for training and turns their systematic softening of the potential energy surface from a liability into a sampling advantage. Across the tested systems, 2000 DFT-recalculated structures are often sufficient to obtain accurate fine-tuned or trained-from-scratch models. For the most challenging case, iterative self-training progressively refines the sampled configuration space and recovers the DFT MoS2 potential energy profile with only 600 first-principles calculations in total. For a 512-atom system on a single nvidia A100 GPU and four 32-core CPU nodes, the complete workflow─including training data generation, DFT labeling, and model creation─delivers 1,000,000 ab initio-quality MD steps in 3 days.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.