Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42720268›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2026

Risk Adjustment in the Medicare Advantage Population Using Encounter Data.

Caroline S Carlin, Roger Feldman, Jeah Jung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caroline S CarlinDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0813-3433
Roger FeldmanDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Jeah JungDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7574-0677

Funding

Resource Use and Quality of Care in Medicare AdvantageR01AG069352 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI JUNG, JEAH · 2020 to 2023
$2.7M
NIA NIH HHS 1R01AG069352-01A1NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) risk model using Medicare Advantage (MA) encounter data, as an initial step toward recalibrating risk-adjusted MA payments. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY

settingA 20% sample of Traditional Medicare (TM) claims and MA encounter data for 2016-2022. Standardized fee schedules provide a measure of resource use in TM claims and MA encounters. STUDY

designOrdinary least squares regression replication of the CMS HCC version 28 model for relative resource use among community-dwelling, non-dual aged and disabled individuals. Robustness testing includes replication with version 22 model structure, sensitivity to MA chart review records, MA contracts with complete encounter data, and patterns of care during the COVID pandemic. PRINCIPAL

findingsUsing TM data from 2016 to 2022 results in modest changes in estimated coefficients and 1.7% lower average HCC scores, relative to 2018-2019 TM data used for CMS's HCC model v28. Using MA data result in 8.9% lower average scores than TM-based scores. The differences between MA- and TM-based HCC scores vary across the distribution of scores. When re-estimating HCC v28 coefficients, increasing trends in TM and MA diagnosis prevalence are associated with smaller (diluted) coefficients in TM and MA-based HCC risk models. Trends in medical technology can increase (e.g., high-cost targeted cancer therapies) or decrease (e.g., lower-cost biosimilars) HCC model coefficients, with evidence of larger technology-related decreases in an MA-based model. The decrease in MA-based scores does not create new disincentives to enroll beneficiaries who are racial/ethnic minorities or rural residents.

conclusionsWe make an important contribution to the policy debate about MA risk adjustment. Any changes in risk-adjusted MA payment need to be reviewed in the full context of MA payment policy and MA plan enrollment incentives.

Indexed as

Medicare Part CRisk AdjustmentAgedCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.COVID-19FemaleHumansMaleUnited Statesencounter datamedicare advantagerisk adjustment

Identifiers

PMID42720268
PMCPMC13560787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.