ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Age and Surgical Outcomes in Gender-affirming Mastectomy: A 12-year Institutional Review.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gender-affirming mastectomy is the most frequently performed surgical procedure among the transmasculine population. This study evaluates surgical outcomes over a 12-year study period and examines associations between changing patient demographics and surgical results. Methods: A retrospective chart review of all gender-affirming mastectomies between January 2011 and December 2022 was performed. Postoperative outcomes included complications and revision rates over time. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed to assess the association between patient age and postoperative complications and revision surgery, adjusting for clinically relevant confounders. Results: A total of 258 patients were included, with a median age of 24 years (range 16-61 y). During the study period, surgical volume increased, accompanied by a notable trend toward younger patients. Overall complication and revision rates were 15.1% and 22.8%, respectively, and both declined significantly over time. Despite these concurrent trends, we did not observe a significant association between patient age and postoperative complications or revision surgery. After multivariable adjustment, year of surgery remained the only variable independently associated with a reduced risk of postoperative complications (odds ratio 0.89, Conclusions: In this single-institution cohort, we did not observe a significant association between patient age and postoperative complications or revision surgery following gender-affirming mastectomy. Improvements in surgical outcomes were related to year of surgery, likely a reflection of cumulative procedural refinement and evolving patient selection based on increasing institutional experience in gender-affirming care over time.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.