ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
NeuraGraph: a visual workflow framework for reproducible biomedical text mining with LLM-agents.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Summary: Biomedical text mining increasingly demands hybrid pipelines integrating traditional NLP toolkits and LLM-based agents, yet building reproducible and modular workflows remains challenging. We present NeuraGraph, a lightweight open-source Python framework for reproducible biomedical text mining workflows integrating traditional NLP components and LLM-based agents. NeuraGraph provides hierarchical workflow composition through reusable subgraphs, built-in batch experimentation with standardized evaluation, and an LLM-powered reporting and refinement engine for workflow optimization. We evaluated NeuraGraph on named entity recognition and chemical-induced disease relation extraction using the BioCreative V CDR benchmark. An optimized relation extraction workflow improved Micro-F1 from 0.656 to 0.673 and Macro-F1 from 0.642 to 0.666 through reporting-guided refinement. Compared with functionally equivalent custom implementations, NeuraGraph reduced implementation effort from 366 to 135 source code lines for relation extraction workflows while maintaining comparable extraction performance. The framework facilitates systematic comparison, reproducible evaluation, and rapid development of hybrid biomedical text mining pipelines. Availability and implementation: NeuraGraph is implemented in Python 3.12+ and released under the MIT license, with all dependencies listed in a requirements.txt file for straightforward installation. Source code and documentation are available at https://github.com/tyrone1979/neuragraph. The software runs natively on Linux, macOS, and Windows.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.