Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719876›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2027

In-silico investigation into optimal photoacoustic probe design using a digital thyroid phantom.

Max T Rietberg, Jeroen Veltman, Jelmer M Wolterink, Srirang Manohar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Max T RietbergUniversity of Twente, TechMed Centre, Multi-Modality Medical Imaging, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8959-6477
Jeroen VeltmanUniversity of Twente, TechMed Centre, Multi-Modality Medical Imaging, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Jelmer M WolterinkUniversity of Twente, TechMed Centre, Department of Applied Mathematics, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Srirang ManoharUniversity of Twente, TechMed Centre, Multi-Modality Medical Imaging, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Thyroid nodules have a high incidence, but a low malignancy rate, placing demands on imaging specificity. Photoacoustic imaging is being studied as a method that could potentially help increase the unsatisfactory specificity of ultrasound, the current first-line imaging method, which would decrease the number of unnecessary clinical interventions. Aim: We employ a digital thyroid phantom and numerical simulations to evaluate photoacoustic probe designs on their suitability for thyroid nodule risk estimation. Approach: Using the SIMPA toolkit, we examined 1080 probe configurations with varying illumination geometry, detector shape, pitch, and wavelength combinations. The performance of each probe was quantified on its sensitivity and its accuracy of oxygen saturation estimation. Results: Optimal performance was found using wavelengths 757 and 800 nm, and a curved detector (0.5 split, 0.40 mm pitch) for external illumination. However, performance increases significantly with endotracheal illumination, using wavelengths of 700 and 800 nm, and a curved detector (0.25 split, 0.40 mm pitch). Conclusions: These results could provide design guidance for optimizing photoacoustic hardware, assisting with the clinical adoption of PAI, which could improve the diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingPhotoacoustic TechniquesThyroid GlandThyroid NoduleComputer SimulationEquipment DesignHumansin siliconodulephantomphotoacoustic imagingthyroid

Identifiers

PMID42719876
PMCPMC13557616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.