ArticleThe British journal of cardiology2026
Let's be CLEAR: Cath Lab Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Risk is a disease modifying opportunity.
Article in The British journal of cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with early identification and management of risk factors being crucial to its management. Patients undergoing day-case angiograms represent a relatively high-risk population, yet often lack comprehensive risk-factor evaluation. Interventions have been shown to be more consistently aligned with guideline-recommended targets when conducted in hospital. As such, the cardiac catheterisation lab offers an invaluable opportunity for cardiovascular risk factor screening and intervention. We enrolled 585 consecutive patients attending our institution for day-case coronary angiograms. Blood samples were collected for lipid profile and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), in addition to blood pressure recordings and a smoking history taken. The results were available for clinician review on the day, with encouragement to intervene on off-target risk factors. We identified high levels of patients with established CAD and risk factors outside of the target range. This included 77% and 70% with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) above target, respectively. There were also 19% smoking and 14% with HbA1c above target. A number of patients with CAD and previously undiagnosed risk factors were also identified, including 18 newly diagnosed with diabetes. A considerable proportion of these had interventions made on the day of their procedure. Our results demonstrate a clear benefit to risk-factor screening in the catheterisation lab, with a high number of patients found to have risk factors outside of the target range, or previously undiagnosed, and appropriate interventions were made as a result.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.