ArticleThe British journal of cardiology2026
Secondary prevention lipid management after ACS at a DGH: a quality improvement project.
Article in The British journal of cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lipid management is a key component of secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but guideline adherence is variable. Adjunctive lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) beyond statins are available, yet eligibility in the real-world setting is not well-described. We aimed to improve local post-ACS lipid management, and evaluate eligibility for LLTs. Consecutive admissions of patients with ACS to a district general hospital from April to June 2022 were assessed for: inpatient lipid-profile assessment, inpatient LLT management, and outpatient repeat lipid profiles. A structured intervention, including updating blood testing panels, education, and reference resources, was implemented. We re-audited admissions in April-June 2024, where eligibility for adjunctive LLTs was assessed. There were 97 (cycle 1) and 102 (cycle 2) patients identified. While performance was suboptimal in cycle 1, we observed improvements in cycle 2 (baseline full lipid profile testing from 10% to 75%; appropriate LLT management 65% to 78%; post-discharge repeat testing 37% to 63%). At one year post-ACS, 35% of patients remained subtherapeutic, but medication changes were rare. In conclusion, through use of a structured intervention, we were able to improve post-ACS lipid management. Many patients fail to achieve therapeutic lipid lowering. Strategies to address this are urgently required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.