Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719791›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

The Society for Women in Radiation Oncology Medical Physicists: Where Are We Five Years Later?

Raksha M Narasimhan, Morgan S Levy, Madison Blanco, Isabella B Dreyfuss, Rebecca F Krc, Taylor J Corriher, Maryam Mashayekhi, Sara B Ponce, Katie Lichter, Anna I Caldwell and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Raksha M NarasimhanDepartment of Medical Education, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Morgan S LevyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, USA.
Madison BlancoDepartment of Medical Education, Washington State University Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, USA.
Isabella B DreyfussDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Rebecca F KrcDepartment of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University Medicine, Morgantown, USA.
Taylor J CorriherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, USA.
Maryam MashayekhiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
Sara B PonceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Associates, Ltd., Appleton, USA.
Katie LichterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Anna I CaldwellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, USA.
Reshma JagsiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Decatur, USA.
Jenna M KahnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kaiser Northwest Permanente, Portland, USA.
Winnifred WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Celilo Cancer Center, Adventist Health Columbia Gorge, The Dalles, USA.
Adrianna MastersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, USA.
Afua A YorkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, USA.
Crystal Seldon TaswellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background A better understanding of the personal experiences of women and gender minorities in medical physics is needed to ensure the vitality of the radiation oncology (RO) workforce. Founded in 2017, the Society for Women in Radiation Oncology (SWRO) sought to promote gender equity in RO and includes both physician and medical physicist members. Methods From January to February 2023, an anonymous 82-question survey was conducted among all current SWRO members, including both physicians and medical physicists, via the SWRO email listserv. Survey questions covered demographics, family planning, mentorship, well-being, perceptions of SWRO membership, and perceptions of the RO field. A sub-analysis was performed on the survey responses from medical physicists. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize the findings. Results In this sub-analysis of physicists, 20 of 26 physicist members (77% participation rate), including 15 medical physicists and five resident physicists, completed the survey. The majority of survey respondents were in the 31-35 year old age group (35%) and female (95%). The top three limitations of academic productivity reported included clinical responsibilities (34%), insufficient mentorship (26%), and insufficient funding (16%). Twenty-eight percent of respondents reported feeling somewhat or extremely satisfied with the mentorship available at their institution, while 60% reported being somewhat or extremely satisfied with female mentorship in the field. Thirty-nine percent of respondents perceived gender-specific biases or obstacles within their program. Among respondents, 44% reported unwanted sexual comments, attention, or advances by colleagues or superiors. Suggested areas for improvement included increasing education on career development, promoting greater physics representation within SWRO, enhancing integration of physics and RO events, and increasing opportunities for in-person interaction. Conclusion This sub-analysis of a broader SWRO survey presents the perspectives of women and gender minority physicists within RO, highlighting shared opportunities for improvement between RO physicians and physicists regarding female mentorship and gender-based challenges. This supports the importance of organizations such as SWRO in promoting representation and gender equity in RO.

Indexed as

academic productivitygender biasgender equalitygender equity in radiation oncologymentorshipphysicist perspectivesswro surveywomen physicistsworkforce experiencesworkplace barriers

Identifiers

PMID42719791
PMCPMC13557049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.