ArticleJournal of hazardous materials advances2026
Enhancing PFAS data integrity: An LLM-based FAIR+Environmental principle for improved evaluation of environmental contaminants and related constituent databases.
Article in Journal of hazardous materials advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent, bioaccumulative contaminants of emerging concern, yet data sharing of their environmental occurrence and monitoring remains fragmented. We propose a "FAIR+Environmental" framework that extends the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) principles to environmental-specific matrices, assessed by a semi-automated Large Language Model (LLM) pipeline that uses rule-based scoring, few-shot prompting, and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. We applied the framework to >100 U.S. PFAS datasets across groundwater, surface water, drinking water, and soil matrices. Few-shot CoT LLMs streamlined FAIR evaluations, reducing the manual effort required for expert assessments. Among environmental matrices, surface water datasets achieved the highest FAIR-Score (53.6 %), followed by drinking water (52.6 %), soil (49.3 %), and groundwater (45.2 %). Multi-state datasets consistently outperformed single-state datasets, particularly in Interoperability and Reusability criteria. Compared to geoscience databases, PFAS environmental datasets lag in FAIR adherence, highlighting the urgent need for centralized, standardized, and FAIR-compliant data management in the field. PFOA occurrence indicated overall PFAS pollution hotspots because of its frequent detection. PFOA contamination was most severe in soil and groundwater. Surface water and drinking water showed lower concentrations but remain critical public health exposures, with ~34 % of drinking water samples exceeding the 4 ng/L maximum contaminant level. Temporal trends indicated little significant change in PFOA concentrations across most states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.