ArticleClinical kidney journal2026
Coordinated clinical trial networks in nephrology: strengthening research infrastructure and improving trial delivery.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects ∼10% of the global population and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Although therapeutic options in nephrology are rapidly expanding, the capacity to conduct large-scale clinical trials in Europe is increasingly constrained by fragmented infrastructure, complex administrative processes, and unequal access to trial participation. Coordinated clinical trial networks have emerged as a strategy to address these challenges. By enabling central feasibility assessment, harmonised contracting through pre-existing master agreements, and systematic outreach to all participating sites, such networks can accelerate trial start-up, improve recruitment, and enhance inclusivity. Nephrology Research Organisation The Netherlands (NEFRO-NL) represents a recent example of this approach. By linking hospitals nationwide, this trial network facilitates multicentre collaboration, supports investigator-initiated research, and promotes more efficient use of patient populations. While long-term impact on trial performance remains to be established, early experience suggests that coordinated trial networks can enhance efficiency and broaden participation in nephrology research. More broadly, coordinated clinical trial networks are likely to become essential infrastructure for delivering timely, high-quality, and inclusive nephrology research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.