Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719753›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2026

Coordinated clinical trial networks in nephrology: strengthening research infrastructure and improving trial delivery.

Martin H de Borst, Aaltje Y Adema, Jeetindra Balak, Hiddo J L Heerspink, Melanie Schoutteten, Ellen K Hoogeveen, Ewout J Hoorn, Niki Leenders, Sabine C A Meijvis, Gurbey Ocak and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Martin H de BorstDepartments of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4127-8733
Aaltje Y AdemaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Frisius Medical Center Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Jeetindra BalakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Hiddo J L HeerspinkDepartments of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3126-3730
Melanie SchouttetenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Ellen K HoogeveenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.
Ewout J HoornDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8738-3571
Niki LeendersDepartment of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sabine C A MeijvisDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gurbey OcakDepartment of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Joris I RotmansDepartments of Nephrology and Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Femke WaandersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
NEFRO-NL Collaborators
Raphael DuivenvoordenDepartment of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Liffert VogtDepartment of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
NEFRO-NL Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects ∼10% of the global population and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Although therapeutic options in nephrology are rapidly expanding, the capacity to conduct large-scale clinical trials in Europe is increasingly constrained by fragmented infrastructure, complex administrative processes, and unequal access to trial participation. Coordinated clinical trial networks have emerged as a strategy to address these challenges. By enabling central feasibility assessment, harmonised contracting through pre-existing master agreements, and systematic outreach to all participating sites, such networks can accelerate trial start-up, improve recruitment, and enhance inclusivity. Nephrology Research Organisation The Netherlands (NEFRO-NL) represents a recent example of this approach. By linking hospitals nationwide, this trial network facilitates multicentre collaboration, supports investigator-initiated research, and promotes more efficient use of patient populations. While long-term impact on trial performance remains to be established, early experience suggests that coordinated trial networks can enhance efficiency and broaden participation in nephrology research. More broadly, coordinated clinical trial networks are likely to become essential infrastructure for delivering timely, high-quality, and inclusive nephrology research.

Indexed as

CKDclinical trialpatient recruitmentresearch infrastructuretrial networks

Identifiers

PMID42719753
PMCPMC13556651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.