Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719743›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Objective Hair Shaft Diameter Measurement From Trichoscopic Images Using Intensity Profile Analysis.

Jesús Iván Martínez-Ortega, Frida Itzel Rosas-Lezama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jesús Iván Martínez-OrtegaHistology, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, MEX.
Frida Itzel Rosas-LezamaInternal Medicine, Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), Merida, MEX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hair shaft diameter variability (anisotrichosis) is the most sensitive trichoscopic feature of androgenetic alopecia, yet its objective assessment remains dependent on manual measurements or dedicated image-analysis platforms. This technical report describes a simple and standardized workflow for objective hair shaft morphometry using grayscale intensity profile analysis from conventional trichoscopic images. A trichoscopic image obtained from a 50-year-old woman with female pattern hair loss was analyzed using Fiji (ImageJ). After grayscale conversion and threshold-based binarization, the image was systematically divided into four quadrants, and five free-standing proximal hair shafts were selected from each quadrant. Perpendicular grayscale intensity profiles were generated using the native Plot Profile function, and hair shaft width was estimated by counting consecutive low-intensity profile points below a predefined grayscale threshold of 200 arbitrary units, which was empirically selected for this proof-of-concept analysis. Twenty individual hair shafts were successfully analyzed. The proposed workflow consistently generated well-defined grayscale intensity profiles that enabled objective estimation of hair shaft width using only native Fiji functionality without proprietary software, additional plugins, or programming expertise. This single-image proof-of-concept study demonstrates how native image-analysis functions can be repurposed to transform qualitative dermatologic observations into objective morphometric descriptors while establishing a methodological foundation for future automated hair morphometry and quantitative characterization of hair shaft heterogeneity.

Indexed as

anisotrichosisbiomedical image analysisdigital morphometryfemale pattern hair losshair morphometryhair shaft diameterimage analysisimagejquantitative trichoscopytrichoscopy

Identifiers

PMID42719743
PMCPMC13556277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.