Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719678›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Education2026

Education Research: More Than a Checkbox: Implementing a Narrative-Based Child Neurology Resident Assessment System.

Christopher Latimer, Robert Thompson Stone, Elizabeth T Troy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher LatimerDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora; and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2686-5721
Robert Thompson StoneDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1062-854X
Elizabeth T TroyDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora; and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5323-428X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Frequent, high-quality feedback is essential for competency-based medical education, yet many graduate medical education assessment systems rely on rating scales and infrequent assessments, limiting actionable feedback. Narrative comments, recognized for their catalytic effect, remain underutilized. The objective of this study was to design and implement a narrative-based, competency-mapped assessment system within a child neurology residency program and evaluate the feasibility of this reform. Methods: The University of Colorado Child Neurology Residency Program redesigned its assessment system in 2023, guided by the Good Assessment framework and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Child Neurology Milestones. The new system prioritized adaptability to clinical context, narrative specificity, and integration into existing MedHub workflows. Each form required selection of a competency to assess and justification through narrative comments. Faculty development sessions introduced the structure, expectations, and strategies for writing effective narrative comments. Primary outcomes included volume of assessments and narrative comments. Secondary measures included assessor diversity, time to completion, and distribution of competency selection. We conducted a pre-post analysis comparing a 6-month preintervention period (July-December 2023) with a 6-month postintervention period (July-December 2024). Results: In the first year of implementation, there were 13 residents. A total of 260 assessments were completed (mean 28.9 per resident), generating 816 narrative comments (mean 90.7 per resident). The median time to completion was 10.5 days (IQR 2-24). Forty-nine unique assessors contributed, including physicians (79.5%) and nonphysicians (20.5%). In the pre-post comparison, assessments increased by 129% (55 to 126), unique assessors by 106% (16 to 33), and narrative comments by 512% (49 to 300). Narrative comments addressed all mapped competencies, with Patient Care and Interpersonal Communication Skills most frequently represented. Discussion: A narrative-based, adaptable assessment system is feasible to implement at scale within a child neurology residency program and substantially increases the volume of workplace-based assessments. The system diversified assessors' perspectives and produced narrative comments across all competencies without compromising timeliness. Limitations include single-site design and absence of narrative quality assessment. Future work will focus on evaluating the quality of narrative comments and acceptability of this assessment methodology.

Identifiers

PMID42719678
PMCPMC13555679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.