Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719672›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2026

Redo Axillary Artery Cannulation in Reoperative Cardiac Surgery: Outcomes and Technique.

Lauren V Huckaby, Andrew M Vekstein, Peter S Downey, Julie Doberne, Jovan Markovic, Jeffrey G Gaca, G Chad Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauren V HuckabyDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Andrew M VeksteinDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Peter S DowneyDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, California.
Julie DoberneDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Jovan MarkovicDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Jeffrey G GacaDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
G Chad HughesDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reoperative sternotomy often necessitates peripheral arterial cannulation to initiate systemic or cerebral perfusion. In patients with prior right axillary cannulation, the site can be reused by anastomosing a new Dacron graft at, proximal to, or distal to the original anastomosis. Axillary cannulation provides reliable systemic perfusion while avoiding the embolic risks of femoral access and technical challenges of central cannulation in the redo setting. However, outcomes after redo axillary cannulation are sparsely reported, and the safety of this approach is not well defined. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 55 consecutive patients (2008-2025) who underwent redo axillary cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass during complex adult cardiac surgery at a single high-volume aortic referral center. Thirty-day/in-hospital outcomes were recorded, and operative technique was described. Redo cannulation involved anastomosis of a Dacron side-arm graft at the prior site or immediately adjacent along the axillary artery. Results: In 55 patients (mean age, 58.9 years; 72.7% male), redo axillary cannulation was performed a median of 4.6 years after the original operation. The most common indications for reoperation were aneurysm (60.0%) and structural valve degeneration (23.6%). Thirty-day mortality was 1.8%, and perioperative stroke occurred in 3.6% (n = 2). Ipsilateral upper extremity neurovascular complications were uncommon (3.6%), and no wound complications were observed. Conclusions: Redo axillary cannulation is technically feasible and safe, with low rates of stroke, neurovascular injury, and no wound complications in this series. Prior axillary cannulation should not preclude reuse of the artery, offering a reliable alternative when central or femoral cannulation is undesirable.

Identifiers

PMID42719672
PMCPMC13555482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.