ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Interventions following routine hemoglobin assessment after vaginal delivery.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the utility of routine postpartum hemoglobin (Hgb) testing after vaginal delivery with normal blood loss by evaluating the frequency of blood transfusion and intravenous (IV) iron administration. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included vaginal deliveries with blood loss <500 mL at a tertiary hospital between January 2020 and May 2025. Patients with missing blood loss data, preeclampsia/eclampsia, or a hemorrhage diagnosis were excluded. Predelivery and postpartum Hgb values, as well as blood transfusion and IV iron administration, were collected. The primary outcomes were postpartum blood transfusion and IV iron administration. Univariate logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with blood transfusion and IV iron administration. Multivariable logistic regression was then performed to evaluate independent predictors of each outcome. Manual chart review was performed for those who received a blood transfusion or IV iron to identify signs of anemia and relevant comorbidities. Results: Of 21,719 vaginal deliveries, 11,180 were included. Of these, 10,075 (90.1%) underwent postpartum Hgb testing with a mean Hgb decrease of 1.3 g/dL (SD, 0.9) pre- to postdelivery. Among the 11,180 deliveries, 19 (0.2%) received blood transfusion, and 82 (0.7%) received IV iron. Higher predelivery Hgb was associated with lower odds of blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR], 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.38) and IV iron administration (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.20-0.30). Among the 10,954 deliveries with predelivery Hgb ≥9 g/dL, six (0.05%) received blood transfusion. Of these six patients, five had anemia symptoms ( Conclusion: In this large cohort of vaginal deliveries with normal blood loss, blood transfusion and IV iron administration were rare. Selective postpartum Hgb testing based on predelivery Hgb and symptoms or comorbidities can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.