Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719649›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2026

Posterior Pericardiotomy: Historical Perspective, Current Techniques, and Clinical Outcomes.

Edward Hauptmann, Erin Hoover, Raghav Chandra, Madhuri Nagaraj, Paige Deblieux, Jasmina Ehab, Suresh Keshavamurthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edward HauptmannDepartment of General Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Erin HooverDepartment of General Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Raghav ChandraDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Madhuri NagarajDepartment of General Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Paige DeblieuxDepartment of General Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Jasmina EhabDepartment of General Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Suresh KeshavamurthyDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiac tamponade and postoperative atrial fibrillation remain significant challenges after cardiac surgery, contributing to higher morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Posterior pericardiotomy (PP) has been used to reduce these complications. This review summarizes the history, technique, and clinical evidence for PP. Methods: We identified recent studies related to PP to perform a narrative overview of its indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes. This was supplemented with historical context from cardiac surgeons who were early adopters of the procedure. Results: Evidence demonstrates that PP reduces postoperative pericardial effusion, tamponade, and postoperative atrial fibrillation by improving pericardial drainage, preventing tamponade, and secondarily decreasing pericardial inflammation and oxidative stress. Conclusions: Despite receiving a class 2a recommendation in recent American College of Cardiology guidelines for atrial fibrillation prevention, PP is not widely performed. Given its simplicity, safety, and effectiveness, wider use of PP could improve outcomes after cardiac surgery.

Identifiers

PMID42719649
PMCPMC13555470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.