ArticleAnnals of thoracic surgery short reports2026
Posterior Pericardiotomy: Historical Perspective, Current Techniques, and Clinical Outcomes.
Article in Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac tamponade and postoperative atrial fibrillation remain significant challenges after cardiac surgery, contributing to higher morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Posterior pericardiotomy (PP) has been used to reduce these complications. This review summarizes the history, technique, and clinical evidence for PP. Methods: We identified recent studies related to PP to perform a narrative overview of its indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes. This was supplemented with historical context from cardiac surgeons who were early adopters of the procedure. Results: Evidence demonstrates that PP reduces postoperative pericardial effusion, tamponade, and postoperative atrial fibrillation by improving pericardial drainage, preventing tamponade, and secondarily decreasing pericardial inflammation and oxidative stress. Conclusions: Despite receiving a class 2a recommendation in recent American College of Cardiology guidelines for atrial fibrillation prevention, PP is not widely performed. Given its simplicity, safety, and effectiveness, wider use of PP could improve outcomes after cardiac surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.