ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Current real-life survival after segmentectomy for lung cancer.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasingly performed for small-sized lesions. However, prognostic factors associated with poor outcomes after this lung-sparing oncologic surgery remain uncertain. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study including 100 consecutive patients who underwent single or multiple segmentectomies for NSCLC in real-world practice. Results: In univariate analyses, compromise segmentectomy (HR 3.52; Conclusion: In this real-world cohort, compromise segmentectomy identified a high-risk subgroup with impaired overall survival, probably reflecting baseline frailty and comorbidity rather than a clearly demonstrated increase in recurrence. These findings support careful preoperative selection and counseling of patients considered for lung-sparing resection outside standard indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.