ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
A pilot randomized controlled study of a digital art therapy paradigm for children with ASD: integrating pivotal response treatment into video animation and physical model design.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The integration of digital technology into art therapy for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) represents an emerging trend, yet systematic design frameworks that translate evidence-based interventions into digital media remain underdeveloped. This study developed and evaluated a digital art therapy paradigm that structurally integrates pivotal response treatment (PRT) into video animation design while maintaining cross-media consistency with physical generalization tools. Methods: Based on the behavioral characteristics of children with ASD, 12 sets of video animations integrating PRT and corresponding physical scene models were custom developed. Thirty-eight children with mild to moderate ASD were randomly assigned to an intervention group (PRT-based video animation with physical models, n=19) and a control group (conventional video animation, n=19) for a 12-week intervention. Pre- and postintervention assessments were conducted using four dimensions of the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC) and behavioral observation. Results: Compared with the control group, the intervention group demonstrated significantly greater improvements across all ATEC dimensions (language communication: F(1,36) = 67.74, p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.755; social skills, F(1,36) = 80.69, p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.786; sensory/cognitive awareness: F(1,36) = 55.69, p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.717; health/physical behavior, F(1,36) = 36.94, p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.627. The percentage of children who reported " no observable behavioral response" in the intervention group decreased from 35% to 10%. Conclusions: This pilot randomized controlled study provides preliminary evidence for the feasibility and efficacy of a multi-component, PRT-informed digital and physical intervention package for children with ASD. The intervention is characterized by three design principles: (1) theoretical translation--embedding the structured steps of PRT into digital interaction logic; (2) cross-media consistency--maintaining visual and functional coherence between video animations and physical generalization tools; and (3) progressive scaffolding--sequencing intervention content from foundational cognition to complex social skills. These findings offer a preliminary design framework for the development of digital art therapy interventions for children with ASD. Future large-checklist replication studies are needed to further validate this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.