ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
A 41-Month Case Report: Correction of Anterior Open Bite Using Clear Aligners Combined With Long-Arm Uprighting Springs.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior open bite (AOB) is a challenging vertical malocclusion that requires careful control of posterior vertical dimension, and when it is combined with first molar loss, restoration of posterior occlusal support may require either prosthetic replacement or orthodontic molar protraction. This case report describes the treatment of a 22-year-old male patient with AOB and compromised first molars who underwent extraction of Teeth 16, 26, and 46 followed by long-distance molar protraction with clear aligners; similar nonprosthetic approaches have been reported for patients with missing first molars, although clear aligner treatment remains less predictable for complex tooth movements and extraction-space closure. During space closure, mesial tipping and aligner off-tracking were managed with long-arm molar uprighting springs used as auxiliary devices, because molar protraction requires appropriate moment-to-force control to reduce uncontrolled crown tipping and improve root paralleling. After 41 months and 82 aligner sets, the extraction spaces were substantially closed, the anterior overbite and overjet were improved, and the facial profile became more harmonious, supporting previous observations that adult AOB correction with aligners may be achievable when vertical control and auxiliary biomechanics are carefully managed. Because root resorption and enamel opacities occurred during treatment, this report also discusses the biological limitations and risk-control considerations of long-distance molar protraction in an adult patient, as prolonged orthodontic tooth movement, extraction-space closure, and aligner or fixed-appliance therapy may be associated with adverse effects such as external apical root resorption and white spot lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.