ArticleClinical practice in pediatric psychology2026
An Item-Level Analysis of Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Among Adolescents in Primary Care.
Article in Clinical practice in pediatric psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Team-Effectiveness Barriers and Solutions to Depression Screening within a Pediatric Hospital Network: A Qualitative Study.Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health · 2026Article
- Effect of Vojta Therapy on Stress and Emotional Well-Being in Parents of Children with Central Coordination Disorders.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Adolescents are at increased risk for meeting diagnostic criteria for depression and chronic impairments in functioning. Despite the potential consequences, adolescents have poor access to mental health treatment. To increase access, professional organizations recommend pediatricians regularly screen for symptoms of depression with the goal of identifying, preventing, and treating depression. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) has become a frequently used screener in primary care due to its brevity and well-established psychometric properties among both adults and adolescents. The present study aims to expand on this research by examining the quality of individual PHQ-9 items in an ecologically valid sample of adolescents screened for depression during their well-child exams. Method: Participants include 11,058 adolescents who were screened using the PHQ-9 at a primary care clinic. Results: This retrospective chart review study demonstrated that all nine items discriminate moderate to severe depression severity. The PHQ-9 provides the most information about two standard deviations above the mean, indicating more error when measuring mild levels of depression. Some PHQ-9 items function best at lower levels of depression, whereas others function best at higher levels of depression. Four of the PHQ-9 items do not show evidence of equal interval response options. Conclusions: Individual symptoms of depression endorsed by adolescents should be considered when interpreting the overall depression scores. The clinical implications related to ultra-brief depression screening and suicidal ideation screening are discussed as well as limitations and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.