Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719482›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2026

Deep extubation versus no-touch awake extubation in adults undergoing elective laparotomy: A randomised controlled trial.

K Sathya Narayanan, R Praveen, D Premkumar, Navya Mishra, Jethroben Kevin, Sundaram Loganathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K Sathya NarayananDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9348-7190
R PraveenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, ESIC Medical College and PGIMSR, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9924-301X
D PremkumarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, ESIC Medical College and PGIMSR, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6343-607X
Navya MishraDepartment of Anaesthesiology, AIIMS Bhubaneshwar, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3028-9848
Jethroben KevinDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kauvery Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0169-3563
Sundaram LoganathanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, ESIC Medical College and PGIMSR, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5814-1314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Tracheal extubation is a vulnerable phase of general anaesthesia. Smooth extubation strategies aim to reduce cough, bucking, and the sympathetic surge. This trial compared deep extubation with no-touch awake extubation in adults undergoing elective laparotomy. Methods: This prospective, randomised, partially outcome-assessor-blinded trial enroled American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II adults scheduled for elective laparotomy, allocated to deep extubation (Group D) or no-touch awake extubation (Group N). The primary outcome was cough (grade ≥1) within five minutes of extubation. Secondary outcomes were cough severity, airway adverse events, airway support, haemodynamics, and recovery characteristics. Results: Seventy patients (35 per group) were analysed. Cough occurred in 3 (8.6%) patients in Group D and 8 (22.9%) in Group N ( Conclusion: Deep extubation did not significantly reduce cough and was associated with more airway-related adverse events and airway support needs, including reintubation. Shorter recovery times and less moderate-to-severe cough in Group D did not reduce these risks. The findings do not support routine use of deep extubation and need confirmation in a larger, adequately powered trial.

Indexed as

Airway extubationanaesthesiageneralhaemodynamicslaparotomyrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID42719482
PMCPMC13557729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.