Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719421›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026

An empirical comparison of deep CNN architectures for heart sound classification from phonocardiogram signals.

Arar Al Tawil, Bodor Bin Sheeha, Aseel Aburub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arar Al TawilDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.
Bodor Bin SheehaDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aseel AburubDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart disease continues to be the world's number one killer, making low-cost, early screening a priority. A phonocardiogram (PCG), a simple recording of sounds made by the heart, provides valuable clues to conditions such as murmurs and valve defects and can be recorded cheaply using a digital stethoscope. With less accessibility to specialists, the automatic analysis of heart sounds is preferred for screening and tele-health environments. We compare five deep convolutional neural networks in this work, namely LeNet5, AlexNet, VGG16, ResNet-50 and a hybrid LSTM-CNN, on the task of separating normal from abnormal heart sounds. Before entering the network, each recording is converted to a log-Mel spectrogram, and each model is trained at five different learning rates (1e-2, 1e-3, 5e-4, 1e-4 and 5e-5). The PhysioNet/CinC Challenge 2016 database is common to all experiments and, after duplicate removal, provides 3, 240 recordings. A leakage-free protocol is enforced throughout: exact duplicates are detected by audio content hashing and the split is patient-independent, which on this dataset is sufficient to prevent several networks from reaching a misleading 100% accuracy. We report accuracy, AUC, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score and the Matthews correlation coefficient. Under five-fold cross-validation VGG16 attains the highest mean accuracy (91.94% ± 1.59, AUC 0.968, MCC 0.745), marginally ahead of ResNet-50 (90.93% ± 1.09); McNemar's test confirms that the difference between the leading architectures is not statistically significant (p = 0.31), so the two are reported as jointly strongest. An ablation study shows that spectrogram augmentation, rather than ImageNet pre-training, is the decisive design choice, and every model fails at a learning rate of 1e-2. External validation on the CirCor DigiScope 2022 database shows that zero-shot cross-dataset transfer performs at chance level, while the retrained pipeline exceeds the majority baseline, underlining how strongly single-dataset results can overstate real-world generalisation.

Indexed as

CNNdeep learningheart soundlog-Mel spectrogramphonocardiogramPhysioNet 2016transfer learning

Identifiers

PMID42719421
PMCPMC13554475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.