Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719397›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2026

T-SMmOTE: tweaked synthetic majority minority oversampling technique for data scarcity issue in multi omics studies.

Payel Sadhukhan, Animesh Acharjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Payel SadhukhanDepartment of Business Analytics, Army Institute of Management Kolkata, Newtown 700160, West Bengal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7795-3385
Animesh AcharjeeDepartment of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2735-7010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Multiomics data offer a rich data mine for modeling complex as well as day-to-day diseases, but their practical deployment is constrained by the limited sample availability. To this end, generating synthetic samples is a viable remedy. Extant schemes operating along this line, however, are mostly limited to augmenting the minority class in imbalanced datasets and often produce synthetic samples that lack sufficient diversity and fail to faithfully capture the underlying data distribution. As a result, the full potential of synthetic augmentation in multi-omics learning remains underexplored. The aim is to address the data scarcity problem in multi-omics domain. We propose a synthetic oversampling framework, which is dedicated to addressing overall data scarcity in multi-omics datasets and the lack of diversity in synthetic samples. Contrary to conventional methods that restrict augmentation to minority classes and rely on interpolation of two neighbors, our method generates diverse yet distribution-aligned synthetic samples by interpolating three neighbors and extends this augmentation paradigm to the majority class. The framework first balances the dataset by generating synthetic minority samples, and subsequently augments the balanced dataset by oversampling both majority and minority classes. Results: Empirical evaluation on multi-omics data obtained from three heterogeneous health scenarios-inflammatory bowel disease, multi-organ dysfunction syndrome, and colorectal cancer-substantiates the utility of the proposed scheme in improving the predictive performance. The models trained on T-SMmOTE-augmented data achieve higher Matthews correlation coefficient values, along with improved Availability and implementation: https://github.com/payelu/TSMm.

Identifiers

PMID42719397
PMCPMC13557112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.