Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719373›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026

Achieving Minimal-to-No Pain in Women with Endometriosis Treated with Relugolix Combination Therapy: SPIRIT Extension Trial.

Andrea S Lukes, Roberta Venturella, Krzysztof Dynowski, Rachel B Wagman, Julie S Perry, Yi Zhong, Viatcheslav G Rakov, Sylvia Mechsner, Neil P Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrea S LukesCarolina Woman's Research and Wellness Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Roberta VenturellaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Krzysztof DynowskiDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The Medical Centre of Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Rachel B WagmanClinical Research, Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA.
Julie S PerryClinical Research, Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA.
Yi ZhongBiostatistics, Sumitomo Pharma America, Marlborough, MA, USA.
Viatcheslav G RakovResearch and Development, Sumitomo Pharma Switzerland GmbH, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0004-0324-9239
Sylvia MechsnerClinic for Gynecology, Endometriosis Center Charité, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Neil P JohnsonObstetrics and Gynaecology, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Relugolix is an oral, non-peptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist administered as once-daily combination therapy (relugolix-CT; 40 mg relugolix, 1 mg estradiol, 0.5 mg norethindrone acetate) to reduce endometriosis symptoms while potentially minimizing hypoestrogenic effects. In the 24-week SPIRIT1&2 studies, relugolix-CT significantly improved endometriosis-associated pain versus placebo, with improvements sustained over the 80-week open-label Long-Term Extension (LTE; all received relugolix-CT). This post hoc analysis of SPIRIT1, 2 and LTE data assessed temporal effects of relugolix-CT on minimal-to-no pain, amenorrhea, and analgesic-free status. Patients and Methods: This analysis included women who received relugolix-CT, delayed relugolix-CT, or placebo in SPIRIT 1 or 2 and entered the LTE. Cumulative probability and median time to minimal-to-no pain for dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP), amenorrhea, and analgesic-free status were assessed. Results: In SPIRIT1&2, 802/1261 women entered the LTE; 501/802 completed 104-week treatment. Median time to minimal-to-no pain for dysmenorrhea was 8 weeks for relugolix-CT and delayed relugolix-CT and was not reached with placebo within 24 weeks; cumulative probability of minimal-to-no dysmenorrhea at Week 24 was 82.5%, 86.4%, and 22.4%, respectively, increasing to 95.3%, 95.9%, and 94.9% at Week 104. Amenorrhea paralleled dysmenorrhea. Median time to minimal-to-no NMPP was 32, 28, and 40 weeks in the relugolix-CT, delayed relugolix-CT, and placebo groups, respectively; cumulative probability of minimal-to-no NMPP was 42.6%, 42.2%, and 28.9% at Week 24, increasing to 70.5%, 74.7%, and 74.3% at Week 104. In the relugolix-CT group, median time to analgesic-free status was 16 weeks; 68.8% and 94.9% were analgesic-free at Weeks 24 and 104. Delayed relugolix-CT results were similar. Analgesic-free status improved in the placebo group after relugolix-CT initiation. Conclusion: In this post hoc analysis, women receiving relugolix-CT for up to 104 weeks had rapid dysmenorrhea improvement with amenorrhea and reduced analgesic use, with longer treatment associated with further NMPP reduction.

Indexed as

amenorrheaanalgesic-freedysmenorrheaGnRH receptor antagonistnon-menstrual pelvic painopioid-free

Identifiers

PMID42719373
PMCPMC13557153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.