Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42719366›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026

Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Prognosis After Nonsurgical Treatment for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear.

Hong Yeol Yang, Inhwan Bae, Ji Won Kim, Gyunghwan Bae, Youzhen Zheng, Sung Ju Kang, Jong Keun Seon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hong Yeol YangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, College of Medicine, Chonnam National University, Hwasun, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8730-9040
Inhwan BaeDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1884-2268
Ji Won KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, College of Medicine, Chonnam National University, Hwasun, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-9200
Gyunghwan BaeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, College of Medicine, Chonnam National University, Hwasun, Republic of Korea.
Youzhen ZhengDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, College of Medicine, Chonnam National University, Hwasun, Republic of Korea.
Sung Ju KangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, College of Medicine, Chonnam National University, Hwasun, Republic of Korea.
Jong Keun SeonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, College of Medicine, Chonnam National University, Hwasun, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6450-2339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) is recognized as one of the leading causes of knee osteoarthritis. Given the detrimental effects of MMPRT on knee kinematics and the associated clinical consequences, substantial efforts have been directed toward improving the understanding and management of MMPRT. Purpose: To develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based prediction model for patient-specific risk assessment of clinical failure at 2 and 5 years after nonsurgical treatment of MMPRT. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of 233 patients who underwent nonsurgical treatment for MMPRT between 2006 and 2020. Patient descriptive characteristics, clinical data, and imaging variables were evaluated for their association with clinical failure, defined as conversion to total knee arthroplasty or corrective osteotomy at 2- and 5-year follow-up. Five conventional machine learning models, including Elastic Net logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, random forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting, as well as a proposed deep learning model, the Grouped Graph Attention (GGAT) network, were developed and internally validated to predict clinical failure. Results: During follow-up, clinical failure occurred in 36 of 233 patients (15.5%) at 2 years and in 54 of 233 patients (23.2%) at 5 years. The deep learning-based GGAT model demonstrated better overall predictive performance compared with conventional machine learning models at both the 2- and 5-year follow-up, with test set accuracy of 0.83 to 0.91, precision of 0.87 to 0.91, sensitivity of 0.92 to 1.00, F1 score of 0.89 to 0.95, Brier score of 0.09 to 0.16, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.69 to 0.77. The most influential predictors of clinical failure included baseline mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle, symptom duration, body mass index, age, bone marrow edema, lateral distal femoral angle, subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee, cartilage lesion, effusion grade, and medial proximal tibial angle. Conclusion: The deep learning-based GGAT network demonstrated accurate prediction of clinical failure at both 2 and 5 years after nonsurgical treatment of MMPRT. These findings underscore the potential value of deep learning-based risk assessment in supporting clinical decision-making and patient counseling.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical failuredeep learningmedial meniscus posterior root tearnonsurgical treatmentprognostic modeling

Identifiers

PMID42719366
PMCPMC13554529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.